Fibrian Anindyawati, Endang Fauziati




The objective of this research is to get a thorough description of the teaching learning process of Writing Course at English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, covering the syllabuses, the learning objectives, the instructional materials, the teachers’ roles, the students’ roles, the classroom techniques, the classroom procedures, the teaching media, and the assessment models. The data of this research were collected through observation, interview, and documentation. This research was a naturalistic study. The result shows that the syllabus used in Writing I

& II is grammatical syllabus and Writing III & IV task-based syllabus. The learning objectives categorized into two namely, general objectives and specific objectives. The instructional materials were divided into three categories: printed materials, visual materials, and materials from the internet. The teachers’ roles were as organizer, consultant, feedback provider, assessor, and motivator. The students’ roles were as active participant, peer reviewer, and peer editor. The classroom techniques consist of brainstorming, discussion, question and answer, self-correction, assignment. The classroom procedures of Writing I & II were BKOF-MOT-ICOT; Writing III were reviewing, gathering ideas, organizing, build writing activity; and Writing IV were reviewing, explaining the materials, gathering ideas, organizing, build writing activity. The media used were LCD Projector, board, slides, and videos. The assessment model consisted of: multiple choices, weekly assignments, quizzes, mid-test, and final-test.



Keywords: Instruction, writing course, teaching writing

Full Text:



Bageridhoust, Esmaeil. 2011. The Impact of Illustrated Tool on Paragraph Writing of High

School Graduates of Qom, Iran. English Language Teaching: Vol. 4, No. 3; September

Brown, H. Douglass. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New

York: Longman.

Brown, H. Douglass. 2000. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language

Pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Cohen, A.D. & Weaver, S.J. 1998. Strategies based Instruction for Second Language Learners.

Anthology Series 39. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.

Fauziati, Endang. 2010. Teaching English As A Foreign Language. Surakarta: Pustaka Utama. Fenghua, Lv. 2010. A Study of Metacognitive-Strategies-Based Writing Instruction for

Vocational College Students. English Language Teaching: Vol 3, No 3 .

Gupta, Depti. 2011. The Influence of Motivation and Attitude on Writing Strategy Use of Undergraduate EFL Students: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives. International Journal. India: Panjab University

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Longman. Harmer, Jeremy. 1998. How to Teach English. Cambridge: Longman.

Javaherbakh, Mohammad Reza. 2010. The Impact of Self-Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Skill. International Journal. Iran: Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University.

Nezakatgoo, Behzad. 2011. The Effects of Portfolio Assessment on Writing of ESL Students.

International Journal. Iran: Allameh Tabatabie University.

Raimes, Ann. 1983. Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Oxford University Press. Reigeluth, Charles M. 1999. Instructional Design Theories and Models. New Jersey: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Richard, J.C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Sulaikah, Siti. 2013. The Instructional Design of the Teaching English as Foreign Language at Kindergartens in Salatiga: A Micro Etnography. Unpublished Thesis Paper. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.

Trong, Luu Tuan. 2010. Enhancing EFL Learners’ Writing Skill via Journal Writing.

International Journal. Vietnam: Natural University of Ho Chi Minh City.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 188 time(s)
PDF: 83 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.