THE EXPRESSIONS OF DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE FILM ENTITLED “MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS” FILM (A PRAGMATICS APPROACH)

Nataliya Nataliya(1*), Sri Marmanto(2)

(1) Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out the types of directive speech acts in the film entitled Mary Queen of Scots, the way the speakers expressed those types, and the reasons underlying the speakers to utter those types. This research uses Pragmatics approach. This study was designed with descriptive research. The analyzed data were all the dialogs which expressed the types of directive speech acts of Mary Queen of Scots film. The total sampling technique is used in taking the data analysis. The researcher analyzed the data found in the film based on problem statements. First, the findings are as follows 6 types of directive speech acts consisting of Command, 13 data (42%), Request 3 data (16%), Question 9 data (30%), Suggestion 2 data (6%), Prohibition 1 datum (3%), and Warning 1 datum (3%). Second, three ways of expressing politeness strategies are used by the characters in Mary Queen of Scots. They were Bald On-Record, Positive Politeness, and Off-Record. At last, the reasons characters expressed the directive speech act were to show hearer’s duty, to show anger expression, to respect the hearer, to seek agreement, and find the reason for uttering certain expression.

 

Keywords: pragmatics, directive, speech acts, politeness strategies, film.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Collins, P.J. (2018). Chapter three – Communicating and reasoning with verbal probability expressions. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol 69: 67-105.

Dynel, M. (2016). With or without intentions: accountability and (un) intentional humour in film talk. Journal of pragmatics, Vol. 95: 67-78.

Dynel, M. (2019). Ironic intentions in action and interation. Language Sciences, Vol. 75: 1-14.

Gallagher, A.. (2017). Advancing the human rights of children with communication needs in school. Inernational Journal o Speech-Language Pathology. Vol. 20 (1).

Goodman, N.D. & Frank, M.C. (2016). Pragmatic language interpretation as probabilistic interference. Trends in cognitive science. Vol. 20 (11): 818-829.

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics.California: Oxford University Press.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 468 time(s)
PDF: 271 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.