Tourist Attraction Popularity Mapping based on Geotagged Tweets

Totok Wahyu Wibowo, Ahmad Faizan Bustomi, Anggito Venuary Sukamdi



The development of tourist attractions is now highly influenced by social media. The speed at which information can be disseminated via the Internet has become an essential factor in enabling distinct tourist attractions to potentially gain high popularity in a relatively short time. This condition was not as prevalent several years ago when tourism promotion remained limited to a certain kind of media. As a consequence, rapid change in the relative popularity of tourist attractions is inevitable. Against this, knowledge of tourist attraction hotspots is essential in tourism management. This means there is a need to study how to both quickly determine the popularity level of tourist attractions and encompass a relatively large area. This article utilised tweet data from microblogging website Twitter as the basis from which to determine the popularity level of a tourist attraction. Data mining was conducted using Python and the Tweepy module. The tweet data were collected at the end of April and early May 2017, at times when there are several long holiday weekends. A Tweet Proximity Index (TPI) was used to calculate both the density and frequency of tweets based on a defined search radius. A Density Index (DI) was also used as a technique for determining the popularity. The results from both approaches were then compared to a random survey about people’s perceptions of tourist attractions in the study area. The result shows that geotagged tweet data can be used to determine the popularity of a tourist attraction, although it still only achieved a medium level of accuracy. The TPI approach used in this study produced an accuracy of 76.47%, while the DI achieved only 58.82%. This medium accuracy does indicate that the two approaches are not yet strong enough to be used for decision-making but should be more than adequate as an initial description. Further, it is necessary to improve the method of indexing and the exploration of other aspects of Twitter data.


Twitter, geotagged, hotspot, popularity, tourism

Full Text:



Aggarwal, C. (2015). Data mining: The textbook. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Baiquni, M. (2009). Belajar dari Pasang Surut Peradaban Borobudur dan Konsep Pengembangan Pariwisata Borobudur. Forum Geografi, 23(1), 25-40.

Borne, K. (2014). Top 10 big data challenges a serious look at 10 big data V’s. [Online]. Accessed: 20/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Carley, K., Malik, M., Kowalchuk, M., Pfeffer, J., & Landwehr, P. (2015). Twitter usage in Indonesia. Institute for Software Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

Carto (2017). Connecting Twitter data [Online]. Accessed: 23/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Fauzi, F., Harly, G. S., & Hanrais, H. S. (2012). Analisis penerapan teknologi jaringan LTE 4G di Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Unikom, 10(2), 281-288.

Fisher, D., DeLine, R., Czerwinski, M., & Drucker, S. (2012). Interactions with big data analytics. Magazine Interactions, 19(3), 50-59.

Frank, M. R., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2013). Happiness and the patterns of life: A study of geolocated tweets. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1304.1296.

Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C.A., & Barabasi, A. L. (2008). Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature, 453, 779-782.

Howelka, B. Sitko, I. Beinat, E. Sobolevsky, S. Kazakopoulos, P., & Ratti, C. (2014). Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 41, 260-271.

Huberman, B. A., Romero, D.M., & Wu, F. (2008). Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope [Online]. Accessed: 20/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Jenkins, A., Croitoru, A., Crooks, A.T. & Stefanidis, A. (2016). Crowdsourcing a collective sense of place. PloS one, 11(4), p.e0152932.

Kaisler, S., Armour, F., Espinosa, J. A., & Money, W. (2013). Big data: Issues and challenges moving forward. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 995-1004. IEEE.

Katal, A., Wazid, M., & Goudar, R. H. (2013). Big data: Issues, challenges, tools and good practices. In Contemporary Computing (IC3), 2013 Sixth International Conference on Contemporary Computing. pp. 404-409. IEEE.

Kraak, M. & Ormeling, F. (2010). Cartography: Visualization of Spatial Data. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Laney, D. (2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety. META Group [Online]. Accessed: 21/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Lwin, K. K., Zettsu, K., & Sugiura, K. (2015). Geovisualization and correlation analysis between geotagged Twitter and JMA rainfall data: Case of heavy rain disaster in Hiroshima. In 2nd IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services (ICSDM), 71-76. IEEE.

Miller, H. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2015). Data-driven geography. GeoJournal, 80, 449-461.

O’Reilly, T., & Milstein, S. (2012). The Twitter book. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Rijmenam, M. V. (2013). Why the 3v’s are not sufficient to describe big data. BigData Startups [Online]. Accessed: 20/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Setiawan, B., Rijanta, R., & Baquni, M. (2017). Sustainable tourism development: The adaptation and resilience of the rural communities in (the tourist villages of) Karimunjawa, Central Java. Forum Geografi, 31(2), 232-245.

Setkab (2017). Tahun 2017 Kita Genjot Sektor Pariwisata [Online]. Accessed: 23/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Statista (2016). Number of active Twitter users in leading markets as of May 2016 (in millions) [Online]. Accessed: 23/4/2017. Retrieved from:

Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks, 34(1), 73-81.

Thatcher, J. (2014). Big Data, big questions| Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communication, 8. p.19.

Tsai, C. W., Lai, C. F., Chao, H. C., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Big data analytics: A survey. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 21.

Wibowo, T. W. (2017). Spatial point data analysis of geolocated tweets in the first day of Eid Al-Fitr 2017 in Java Island. Proceedings of the 5th Geoinformation Science Symposium. Yogyakarta.

Yin, J., & Du, Z. (2016). Exploring multi-scale spatiotemporal Twitter user mobility patterns with a visual-analytics approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(10), 187.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 326 time(s)
HTML: 333 time(s) PDF: 40 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.