UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA STUDENTS' CONDITION DEPICTED IN AGUSTANTO SUPRAYOGI'S PETITION POSTED ON CHANGE.ORG

This study aims to find how the writer of petition represent Universitas Brawijaya student condition on 2016 through word choice, and also to find the ideology behind the petition “Ganti WR III Unibraw Malang u/ Selamatkan Mahasiswa & IKA Unibraw Malang dari Perpecahan”. The author used 3 stages of Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework in this study, text analysis, discourse practice, and social practice. The result of this study is there were 16 data that represent how the student were oppressed (3 data) and the Vice-Rector III abusive act (13 data). The ideology behind this petition itself is how students experience persecution by WR 3 illustrated by the selection of words described by the petitioners. The ideology does not escape the author's social background, social conditions, and norms that apply to student life in UB at that time.


INTRODUCTION
A campus does become a country on a small scale, meaning that campus has democratic system resembles a country, in this case, Indonesia. The Republic of Indonesia adheres to the three pillars of government system or separation of power system. These 3 pillars are executive, legislative and judicative. The executive body holds the power to enforce the law, the legislative body has the authority to make laws, and the judicative body is authorized to oversee the law implementation (Sarumpaet, 114: 2016).
The separation of power system is also applied in the campus education system, especially at Universitas Brawijaya (UB) Malang. The separation of power system can be seen in the democratic system of the campus. There are intra-campus organizations that act as student executive and legislative body such as student activity units (UKM), executive council of student (BEM), student executives (EM), and student representative boards (DPM). Both institutions, executive and legislative, supervise all students. UKM BEM and EM act as executive institutions at the faculty and university level to carry out

METHOD
The design of this research is descriptive qualitative research because the data explanation is in the structure of words, not numbers or statistics. This research used Fairclough CDA framework, that contain: text analysis, discourse practice, and social practice, as the base ground to conducting the analysis. The data source is a text titled "Ganti WR III Unibraw Malang u/ Selamatkan Mahasiswa & IKA Unibraw Malang dari Perpecahan (Change the Unibraw Malang Vice-Rector III to save Student and Graduate Association from Discord). The data source was downloaded from website https://www.change.org/p/rektor-ub-malang-ganti-wr-iii-ub-malang-u-selamatkanmahasiswa-ika-ub-malang-dari-perpecahan on 12th May 2018. The data of this research is the words that represent oppression on student and Vice-Rector III abuse of power action.
The data collection method was done by reading, coding, and sorting. The first step is reading the data source, after that, the author gives a code to each data with numbers (example: Data 1, Data 2, and so on). The third step is sorting the data to 2 big classification class that is the words that represent oppression on student and Vice-Rector III abuse of power action.
The analysis used the Fairclough CDA frameworks, the author analyzes the text through the word choice that represents oppression on student and Vice-Rector III abuse of power action to answer the first aim of the study. For the second aim of the study, the author used the correlation between the discourse practice and social practice. In the stage of discourse practice, the author correlated the connection between the text writer and the text consumption in society. In terms of social practice, the author research the background and the condition of the society where the text is produced and consumed through situational, institutional, social paradigm (Eriyanto, 2001).

RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This chapter will discuss the finding that the author found when analyzing the petition "Ganti WR III Unibraw Malang u/ Selamatkan Mahasiswa & IKA Unibraw Malang dari Perpecahan.". This chapter will discuss the finding of this research. This chapter will be divided into three subchapters according to Fairclough CDA framework, text analysis, discourse practice, and social practice.

Text Analysis
The author found 16 data from the petition that represent student oppression from Vice-Rector III and his abuse of power toward the students. From the 16 data, 3 data represent the student oppression from Vice-Rector, and the other 13 data represent Vice-Rector Abuse of power. Analysis: In this sentence It is illustrated how the oppression experienced by UKM by receiving disbandment threat from WR 3. The word "ancaman (threat)" is a noun form of verb "ancam (to threat)", the word "ancaman (threat)" in the KBBI means declaring intent (intention, plan) to do something which is detrimental, difficult, troublesome, or harmful to others. Then followed by the word "pembubaran (disbandment)" based on the word "bubar (dismiss)" which means abolished (about a union, partnership, etc.), this word is aimed at student UKM who are considered disobedient.

Data 3 Sentence: harusnya mampu berlaku arif (should be able to act wisely) In a sentence: Wakil Rektor III yang harusnya mampu berlaku arif dan memfasilitasi aktivitas mahasiswa di kampus malah bertindak bak pemilik kuasa yang otoratif dan seenaknya dalam merespons aktivitas mahasiswa berorganisasi. (Vice-Rector III who should be able to act wisely and facilitate student activities on campus actually acts like a boss who is very authoritative and arbitrarily in responding to student activities in an organization) (sentence 6)
Analysis: The word "harusnya (should be)" has the meaning of proper, it should be, and appropriate. The word "mampu (able)" means power (can, be able to) do something; can, so the combination of these two words means having the ability to do something but not done. The things that cannot be done refer to the phrase "berlaku arif (act wisely)", the word "arif (wise)" in KBBI means wise, clever, knowledgeable. The "arif" meaning in this phrase is "wise" because it is intended for a leader. So, the sentence "should be able to act wisely" implies that Vice-Rector III is, in fact, unable to act wisely towards students.

Data 4
Sentence: bak pemilik kuasa yang otoratif dan seenaknya (acts like a boss who are very authoritative and arbitrarily) In the sentence: Wakil Rektor III yang harusnya mampu berlaku arif dan memfasilitasi aktivitas mahasiswa di kampus malah bertindak bak pemilik kuasa yang otoratif dan seenaknya dalam merespons aktivitas mahasiswa berorganisasi. (Vice-Rector III who should be able to act wisely and facilitate student activities on campus actually acts like a boss who is very authoritative and arbitrarily in responding to student activities in an organization) (sentence 6) Analysis: This sentence shows the abuse done by Vice-Rector III to students. The word "bak (like)" is a proposition to express comparison, the word "bak (like)" is to equate Vice-Rector III with the figure of a ruler. The word "otoratif (authoritative)", in KBBI is a derivation from the word "otoriter (authoritarian)" meaning to rule alone; the word "seenaknya (arbitrarily)" also have the same meaning with authoritarian, so the use of these two adjectives shows an emphasis on the depiction of Vice-Rector III which is fully and arbitrarily in power to the students. Analysis: the word "kerap (often)" in the KBBI means many times; repeatedly; often; while the meaning of "mengancam (threatening)" word is a verb that has a base "ancam (to treat), the word "ancam (to treat)" in the KBBI means stating the intent (intention, plan) to do something that is harmful, difficult, troublesome, or harmful to others. Thus, the meaning of "kerap mengancam (often threatens)" shows the depiction of WR 3 which often acts repressive on students by carrying out threats.

Data 11 Phrase: tidak masalah (not a problem) In the sentence: WR III UB menegaskan jika dia tidak masalah sebuah Organisasi Mahasiswa tingkat Universitas bubar .... (WR III UB emphasized that is not a problem if a University-level Student Organization is disbanded...) (Sentence 13)
Analysis: The word "masalah (problem)" in the KBBI means something that must be resolved (solved). The meaning of "tidak masalah (not a problem)" in the sentence is "mudah (easy)". In this sentence, it illustrates that Vice-Rector III does not care about the fate of students who are active in the UKM that he disbanded, because he can replace these UKM easily.

Data 13 Sentence: menggebrak meja dan berteriak-teriak (hit the table and shouted) In the Sentence: WR III bahkan tidak segan menggebrak meja dan berteriak-teriak sembari mengancam untuk memanggil orang tua mahasiswa jika mahasiswa yang bersangkutan "tidak dapat dikendalikan". (Vice-Rector III did not even hesitate to hit the table and shouted while threatening to call the parents of students if the concerned students were "cannot be controlled") (Sentence 16)
Analysis: This sentence depicted the repressive behavior of Vice-Rector III on students with the word "mengancam (threatening)", plus the previous phrase " menggebrak meja dan berteriak-teriak (hit the table and shouting)". Both gestures can be considered as a gesture to show power or anger.

Data 14 Sentence: tidak dapat dikendalikan (cannot be controlled)
In the sentence: same with data 13 Analysis: The word "dikendalikan (controlled)" comes from the root word "kendali (control)", the word "kendali (control)" in the KBBI means restraint, the restraint itself in the KBBI means everything that is used to prevent acts that are considered unfavorable; to ban. So the meaning of being uncontrollable means that it cannot be restrained, but in this context, it is a form of repression of student's freedom. In addition, this word is a label of Vice-Rector III for students who do not want to submit to his authority. The word also means that there were some students who stand to oppose the repressive act of Vice-Rector III.

Data 15 Sentence: kepentingan dirinya sendiri dan seenaknya mengambil kebijakan-kebijakan secara otoritarian (His own interest and authoritatively taking policies)
In a sentence: WR III UB harusnya tidak mementingkan kepentingan dirinya sendiri dan seenaknya mengambil kebijakankebijakan secara otoritarian atas keberlangsungan aktifitas mahasiswa. (Vice-Rector III UB should not prioritize its own interests and authoritatively taking policies on the welfare of student activities) (sentence 20) Analysis: "Kepentingan diri" (self-interest) and its strings are Authoritarian in the KBBI has a meaning of "kepentingan diri sendiri dan seenaknya (act on own interest and as he wants)", so that their simultaneous use in a sentence gives the impression of emphasizing meaning. This sentence describes the attitude of Vice-Rector III who only thinks of himself in acting and is free to do anything to students with his policies.

Data 16 Sentence: dunia penuh pertunjukan represifitas (a world is full of repressive performances) In Sentence: Dunia kampus harusnya menjadi dunia pembelajaran yang baik, bukan dunia penuh pertunjukan represifitas yang mengatasnamakan klaim-klaim universitas (The campus world should be a good learning world, not a world full of repressive performances in the name of university claims). (Sentence 22) Analysis: The connotative meaning in the phrase " dunia penuh pertunjukan represifitas (the world is full of repressive performances)" is the presupposition of UB environmental conditions is described as a place to show the repression of Vice-Rector III to the students.
From the data obtained by the author above, it can be seen that the word choice that was often used to describe student oppression has a collocation word with the meaning of vanity and not appreciated. While the choice of words used to describe the arbitrariness of Vice-Rector III were words that collocated with words that represent authoritarian and repressive manners. The 16 data will be used to analyze the discourse practices and social practices in the next section.

Discourse Practice Analysis
This section the will explain the results of the analysis of the discourse practice from petition petisi "Ganti WR III Unibraw Malang u/ Selamatkan Mahasiswa & IKA Unibraw Malang dari Perpecahan". Analysis of discourse practices relates to production, distribution, and consumption of text. This petition was made by a man named Agustanto Suprayogi, he is an alumnus of UB's statistics department in 2002, during his college years he became a campus activist for Himaprodi Matematika (Mathematics Student Association), a writer in the faculty magazine Paradigm, and active in Kavling 10 (this is campus journalism and publishing authorship forum). With such an activist's background, it is not surprising that this petition was written with statements describing an oppression. The use of the name of the IKA or the Ikatan Almuni (Alumni Association) is because the petitioner is a UB alumni.
In terms of distribution, Agustanto distributed the online through change.org and on the other social media such as FB, Twitter, Line, etc. The change.org page is a for-profit page owned by Change.org, Inc. Headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA. This page provides public services to create and distribute petitions related to justice, human rights, education, environment, and etc. This happened because the main client of change.org came from a large humanitarian organization such as Amnesty International and the Humane Society.
The consumption of this petition was very well spread among the people at that time, especially for UB's academicians themselves, managed to get 1799 votes in favor of this petition. The petition was finally heard by the rector and immediately consolidated between WR 3 and students. The author also highlighted a number of comments from this petition stating the arrogant, and authoritarian WR 3 behavior that was in accordance with linguistic findings in the analysis of the text. An example is the comment from Muchid Abdul Azis which contains, "Universitas Brawijaya" adalah institusi pendidikan, bukan sebuah "Kerajaan" maka tidak diperlukan yang namanya otoriter. selayaknya mendukung bukan mengungkung ("Universitas Brawijaya" is an educational institution, not a" Kingdom ", so it is not necessary to be an authoritarian. it should support not contain)", then comment from Chaury Syahda Yuita which contains, " Manusia ini sudah terlalu banyak kasus di luaran juga bertindak semena-mena dan arogan, bisa di selidiki kalau tidak percaya (This human also act arbitrarily and arrogantly in many outside cases, you can investigate by yourself if you do not believe ". There are still a lot of comments with the same content as the two comments that the author revealed in here.
From the results of the analysis on discourse practice, we already know who the petitioner is, how he distributed his petition, and also how the petition is consumed. These three things will be used as a basis for analyzing the last stage, analyzing the social practices.

Social Practice Analysis
The third stage in Fairclough's analysis is the analysis of social practice, the analysis at this stage assumes that a discourse is not free from the environmental conditions where the discourse is produced. External factors also had an influence; the external factor here is the condition of the community when or where a discourse is produced. At this stage the analysis will be divided into 3 parts, namely situational, institutional and social analysis.
At the situational stage, this petition arises because of the situation of UKM in UB. For example the Ikatan Mahasiswa Pecinta Alam Universitas Brawijaya (IMPALA UB) and the Brawijaya Student Choir (UB PSM), which at that time felt hampered by its work program because the funds that had not yet given and activities licenses are postponed to these UKM. The second problem is temporary discontinuation of Unit The common thread between this petition and the social conditions of the community, especially in Universitas Brawijaya itself, is the social condition of the Indonesian people who tend to obey the authorities. The picture in Universitas Brawijaya is that the Rector is the ruling party, while the students play the role of the people even though these people have organizations that unify them; they still have to submit to the government. But overcontrolling is also an abuse of power; here WR 3 is described arbitrarily carrying out temporary discontinuation and dissolution of UKM without clear procedures. This situation is almost the same as the situation when President Suharto led.
After analyzing the 3 stages of Fairclough's CDA, the conclusion that can be drawn is that there are around 16 data of word choice that shows the oppression of students by WR 3; 3 data described the student oppression and 13 data showed the Vice-Rector III abuse of power. In the analysis of discourse practice it has been explained that the petitioner, Agustanto Suprayogi is a UB alumni, he wrote the petition in change.org's online petition and won 1799 votes. Then in the analysis of discourse practices can be known situational, institutional, and social conditions as to what text the petition was made.
There are 3 data that shows the selection of words that describe the oppression experienced by students, for example not appreciated, hopeless, and threatened.
2. There are 13 data that shows the selection of words that describe WR 3 abuse to students, for example the example is authoritarian, repressive, arbitrary, threatening, and etc.
3. The ideology contained in this petition is how students experience persecution by WR 3 illustrated by the selection of words described by the petitioners. The ideology behind the selection of words in the petition does not escape the author's social background who are ex-campus activist, current social conditions where the text was produced is contributing on how the text form in reality, and norms that apply to student life in UB at that time is also the factor that influence the text.