PIRANTI KOHESI GRAMATIKAL DAN LEKSIKAL PADA WACANA RUBRIK "SELEBRITAS" DALAM MAJALAH FEMINA SEBAGAI BAHAN AJAR MENULIS TEKS NARASI

Nila Prima Septianingrum(1*), Atiqa Sabardila(2)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study are (1) describes the use of grammatical cohesion devices in the rubric "Selebritas" in the Feminamagazine; (2) describes the use of lexical cohesion devices in the rubric "Selebritas" in the Femina magazine; and (3) implement the use of grammatical and lexical cohesion devices in rubric "Selebritas" in Femina magazine as one of the teaching material to write narrative texts. The results of this study were (1) grammatical cohesion devices analyzed in this study consisted of 10 reference, 6 conjunction, 3substitution, and 3 ellipsis. Counterfeit reference cohesion divided into 7 reference persona, 2 demonstrative reference and 1 comparative reference. Reference persona is divided into 1 pronoun first person singular, 1 pronoun first personplural, 4 pronouns third person singular, and 1 pronouns third person plural; (2) lexical cohesion devices analyzed in this study consisted of 7 equivalence, 2 hyponymy, 2antonym, 2 repetition, 1 synonymy and 1 collocation; and (3) the results of this research are used as teaching material in high school students of class VII in accordance with Curriculum 2013. These teaching materials can be applied to core competencies 4 and basic competence 4.5.1 which students were asked to compile a narrative text.

Keywords

grammatical cohesion devices; lexical cohesion devices; teaching materials; narrative texts

Full Text:

PDF

References

Chaer, Abdul. 2012. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Chao, Chunhong. 2014. “Lexical Cohesion of Sino-British College Student’s EAP Writing”. Scholarly Journals. Volume 4 Number 10. Pages 2123-2128.

Ghufron, Syamsul. 2012. “Peranti Kohesi dalam Wacana Tulis Siswa: Perkembangan dan Kesalahannya”. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni. Volume 6 Nomor 2. Halaman 1-12.

Lestari, Ika. 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Padang: Akademia Permata.

Mulyana. 2005. Kajian Wacana: Teori, Metode & Aplikasi Prinsip-Prinsip Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Nabifar, Nesa and Gholamreza Rostami. 2015. “A Constrative Study of Lexical Cohesion Used in Sport Texts in Washington and Tehran Times Newspapers Written by English Native and Iranian Authors”. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. Volume 5 Number 4. Pages 549-558.

Olajoke, Akinkurolere Susan. 2015. “A Lexical Analysis of an Inaugural Speech of the Speaker of Benue State House of Assembly in Nigeria”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Volume 6 Nomor 2. Pages 258-264.

Parwati, Edin. 2011. “Kohesi Leksikal Repetisi pada Wacana “Wayang Durangpo” dalam Surat Kabar Harian Jawa Pos Edisi Februari-April 2010”. Jurnal Artikulasi. Volume 12 Nomor 2. Halaman 807-816.

Prasetia, I Made Prapta. 2013. “Penggunaan Piranti Kohesi dalam Karangan Narasi Oleh Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Blahbatuh”. Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Volume 1 Nomor 8. Halaman 1-14.

Rani, Abdul, Bustanul Arifin, dan Martutik. 2006. Analisis Wacana: Sebuah Kajian Bahasa dalam Pemakaian. Malang: Bayumedia Publising.

Rassouli, Masoumeh dan Mehdi Abbasvandi. 2013. “The Effects of Explicit Instruction of Grammatical Cohesive Devices on Intermediate Iranian Learner’s Writing”. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. Volume 2 Number 2. Pages 15-22.

Rohmadi, Muhammad dan Yakub Nasucha. 2015. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran. Surakarta: Pustaka Briliant.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Tim Redaksi KBBI Pusat Bahasa. 2014. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Umum. Edisi IV Cetakan Kedelapan.

Zarepour, Fatemeh. 2016. “Cohesion Analysis of Iranian Advanced EFL Learner’s Writing”. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Volume 7 Number 2. Pages 408-414.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1490 time(s)
PDF: 4152 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.