Penentuan Kriteria Pengukuran Indikator Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Diklat Berbasis Kompetensi Menggunakan Metode Focus Group Discussion

Rohmatulloh Rohmatulloh, Julian Ambassadur Shiddiq

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v16i2.4165

Abstract

The formulation of performance indicators is good and meaningful must meet the criteria CREAM (clear, relevant, economic, adequate, and monitorable). In practice, it is often found performance indicators can not be applied because it has a variety of interpretations in the criteria of measurement. The problem is discussed using focus group method (FG). The results of the discussion have succeeded in identifying and consensusing the six criteria for measuring the key performance indicators (KPI) for the implementation of competency-based training, ie training needs analysis, syllabus curriculum, modules, training implementation guidelines, evaluation of training, and evaluation of training implementation (satisfaction and learning). The use of the FG method in this study is effective enough to generate many ideas and the participation of internal stakeholders in solving the problem. The success of FG is highly dependent on pre-discussion planning, especially the deepening of the issues studied and the determination of data sources or participants, who understand the issues being discussed.

Keywords

Performance indicator; competency-based training; focus group

References

Allen, W.C. (2006). "Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system". Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 8 (4), pp. 430 – 441.

Bader, G.E.; Rossi, C.A. (1998). Focus Groups: A Step-By-Step Guide. The Bader Group.

Blanchard, P.N.; Thacker, J.W. (2013). Effective Training: System, Strategies, and Practice. Fifth Edition. Essex: Pearson Education.

Einasto, O. (2014). "E-service Quality Criteria in University Library : A Focus Group Study". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., Vol. 147, pp. 561 – 566.

Kellogg, W.A.; O’Brien, K.; Robey, C.; Toth, K. (2007) "The Use of Focus Groups for Design and Implementation of Collaborative Environmental Administrative Programs : A Comparison of Two State-Level Processes in Ohio". Environmental Practice, Vol. 9 (3), pp. 166 – 178.

Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Second Edi. San Fransisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kusek, J.Z.; Rist, R.C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: a handbook for development practitioners. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

Larasati, A.; Chisbiyah, L.A.; Hidayati, L. (2013) "Penerapan Focus Group Discussion untuk Mengevaluasi Kualitas Layanan Jurusan Teknologi Industri'. Teknologi dan Kejuruan, Vol. 36(2), pp.: 197 – 204.

Morris, M.; Johnson, A.; Booker, S.; Gunnery, R.; Meek, P. (2006). "Designing an education programme for type 1 diabetes : A focus group study". Journal of Diabetes Nursing, Vol. 10 (10), pp. 393 – 399.

Nielsen, M. (2013). A Focus Group Study of Consumer Priorities for Pain Management Resources in NSW.

Parmenter, D. (2007). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs, John Wiley & Sons. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 978-0470545157.

Simigiu, A. (2014). "Investigating the views of civil society on early pregnancy through the focus group method", Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier B.V., Vol. 127, pp. 219 – 224.

Smithson, J. (2000). "Using and analysing focus groups : limitations and possibilities." International Journal Social Research Methodology, Vol. 3(2), pp. 103–119.

Stewart, D.W.; Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice, Applied Social Research Methods Series. Edited by K. A. Clark. California: SAGE Publications.

Williams, A.; Katz, L. (2001) "The use of focus group methodology in education: Some theoretical and practical considerations". International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, Vol. 5(3).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.