Evaluation of Usability on Bionic Anthropomorphic (BIMO) Hand for Disability Hand Patient

Novie Susanto(1*), Heru Prastawa(2), Manik Mahachandra(3), Dinda Ayu Rakhmawati(4),

(1) Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
(2) Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
(3) Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University
(4) 
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v18i2.8133

Abstract

One aspect that needs to be assessed to make better product is usability.  Testing the level of usability on BIMO hand is performed using adapted Southampton Hand Assesment Procedure (SHAP) method. Users are given the task of using prosthetic hand to perform daily activities according to performance measurement rules. Based on the opinion of Jacob Nielsen, the theory used to measure usability are 5 main parameters, i.e: Learnability, Memorability, Efficiency, Satisfaction, and Errors. Testing is done by giving 15 task daily activity to the respondent. After testing, respondents were given USE questionnaires (Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease of use) as a media for usability assessmentand received suggestions from respondents. Some suggestions were obtained from the respondents after the research was conducted, such as the size of the product, censoric product respond, the suitability shape and weight of product. Based on the percentage of USE questionnaire assessment known Usability Prosthetic hand level tested is in the status of GOOD, this indicates the respondents feel the product is good to use.

Keywords

BIMO hand; USE questionnaire; SHAP; usability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, J., Metcalf, C.D., Macleod, C., Spicka, C., Burridge, J.H., Cooper, C. & Cox, N. (2008). Three Dimensional Functional Motion Analysis of Silver Ring Splints in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology: British Society of Rheumatology Annual Meeting.47(Supp2), ii154-ii155.

Adioetomo S., Mont D and Irwanto. (2016). Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia: Fakta Empiris dan Implikasi untuk Kebijakan Perlindungan Sosial. Universitas Indonesia.

Al-Farisi. (2009). Penggunaan Metode UCD Untuk Mencapai Tingkat Usability Yang Tinggi. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Badre, A. N. (2002). Shaping Web usability: interaction design in context. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Band, W. A. (1991). Crafeting Value for Customer. New York: Jhon willey and Sons Inc,

Brey. 2005. Descriptive of Prosthetic Hand Appliance. Naval Medical Research Institute.

Cary, I. & Adams, J. (2003). A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand function in both right and left handed individuals using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP). Brit. J. of Hand Therapy. 8(1), 4-10.

Chisnel, D. (2008). Hand Book of Usability Testing. Indianapolis: Wiley publishing.

Dalley, S.A., Bennett, D.A. & Goldfarb, M. (2014). Functional assessment of the vanderbilt multigrasp myoelectric hand: A continuing case study. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 6195-6198.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly.

Diono, A. (2014). Program Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas dan Pergeseran Paradigma Penanganan Penyandang Disabilitas.

Dumas, J. S., dan Janice. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Revised Edition. Bethesda, USA: Redish & Associates, Inc.

Fougner, A.L., Stavdahl, Ø. & Kyberd, P.J. (2014). System training and assessment in simultaneous proportional myoelectric prosthesis control. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 11:75.

Hermannsson, L.M.N., Andrén, M. & Johansson, D. (2014). Swedish normative data for the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure – SHAP. MEC '14 - Redefining the Norm.

Issa A. Ramirez, Craig P. Lusk, Rajiv Dubey, M. Jason Highsmith, Murray E. Maitland (2009). Crossed Four-Bar Mechanism for Improved Prosthetic Grasp. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 46(8), 1011-1020.

Jordan, P. (1998). An Introduction to Usability. London: Taylor & Francis.

Kemenkes. (2013). Profil Kesehatan. Diakses Januari 2018, dari Kementrian Kesehatan: www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/.../profil-kesehatan-indonesia-2013.pdf

Kyberd, P.J., Murgia, A., Gasson, M., Tjerks, T., Metcalf, C.D., Chappell, P.H., Warwick, K., Lawson, S.E.M. & Barnhill, T. (2009). Case studies to Demonstrate the Range of Applications of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 72(5), 212-218.

Kyberd, P.J. (2011). The influence of control format and hand design in single axis myoelectric hands: assessment of functionality of prosthetic hands using the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Prosthetics & Orthotics International. 35(3), 285-293.

Light, C.M., Chappell, P.H. & Kyberd, P.J. (2002). Establishing a Standardized Clinical Assessment Tool of Pathologic and Prosthetic Hand Function: Normative Data, Reliability, and Validity. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 83, 776-783.

Light, C.M. (2000). An Intelligent Hand Prosthesis and Evaluation of Pathological and Prosthetic Hand Function. PhD Thesis.University of Southampton: UK.

Lund, A.M. (2001). Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter, 8:2.

Metcalf, C.D., Woodward, H., Wright, V., Chappell, P.H., Burridge, J.H. & Yule, V.T. (2008). Changes in Hand Function with Age and Normative Unimpaired Scores when Measured with the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Brit. J. Hand Therapy.13(3), 79-83.

Metcalf, C.D. (2008). The Relationship between Movement and Function of the Wrist and Hand: A Clinically Focused Kinematic Study. PhD Thesis. University of Southampton: UK.

Metcalf, C.D., Adams, J.A., Burridge, J.H., Yule, V.T. & Chappell, P.H. (2007). A Review of Clinical Upper Limb Assessments within the Framework of the WHO ICF. Musculoskeletal Care. 5(3), 160-173.

Murgia, A. (2005). A Gait Analysis Approach to the Study of Upper Limb Kinematics using Activities of Daily Living. PhD Thesis.University of Reading: UK.

Murgia, A., Kyberd, P.J., Chappell, P.H. & Light, C.M. (2004). Marker Placement to Describe the Wrist Movements During Activities of Daily Living in a Cyclical Task. Clinical Biomechanics. 19(3), 248-254.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Mountainview, Calivornia: SunSoft.

Primarezky, E. (2017). Pengembangan 5 DOF Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand PadaPasien Penyandang Disabilitas Tangan. Semarang: Jurusan Teknik Mesin Universitas Diponegoro.

Riskesdas. (2013). Data riskesdas. Diakses Januari 2018, dari Kementrian Kesehatan: www.depkes.go.id/resources/download/general/Hasil%20Riskesdas%202013.pdf

Swastha, B. (2000). Pengantar Bisnis Modern, Pengantar Ekonomi Perusahaan Modern, Jakarta: Liberty.

Van der Niet, O., Bongers, R.M., van der Sluis, C.K. (2013). Functionality of i-LIMB and i-LIMB Pulse hands: Case report. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 50(8), 1123-1128.

Van der Niet Otr, O., Reinders-Messelink, H.A., Bongers, R.M., Bousema, H. & van der Sluis, C. (2011). The i-LIMB Hand and the DMC Plus Hand Compared: A Case Report. Prosthetics & Orthotics International. 34(2), 216-220.

Vasluian, E., Bongers, R.M., Reinders-Messelink, H.A., Dijkstra, P.U. & van der Sluis, C.K. (2014). Preliminary study of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure for Children and its reliability. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 15:199.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 656 time(s)
PDF: 443 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.