Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti Berbasis Lingkungan Melalui Model Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika

Muhammad Fakhrudin Suryana(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research is motivated by the demands of factually growing conditions in character-based environment through a constructivist approach to provide alternative solutions in building and increasing quality of Indonesian human resources. The purpose of the research objective want to describe the motivation, cultivation of character-based environment, and learning achievement. The subject research of class VII A State of Junior High School Three Teras Boyolali second semester of the 2015/2016 academic year as many as 27 students. Methods of data collection using observation, questionnaire, documentation, and testing. Analysis of data using a critical and comparative analysis. Indicators of success using criteria limit minimal amounted to 75, and 100% completeness class. Research procedure uses cycles. The results of research and discussion is known that: the data obtained from pre cycle until the second cycle, obtained advances growth of the manners of learners in mathematics, in pre cycle average of 74 and the first cycle an average of 78 and the second cycle by an average of 81 . from this data, it seems clear that an increase in the average value of pre cycle to the first cycle of four digits (5.4%), from the first cycle to the second cycle an increase of 3 digits (3.7%), from pre cycle to the second cycle an increase of 7 digits (9.5%). The highest value growth of character (character education) on pre cycle by 83, the first cycle of 86, and the third cycle of 89 There is an increase of pre cycle the highest value to the first cycle of 3 digits (3.6%), from the first cycle to the second cycle occurs an increase of 3 digits (3.5%), and the second cycle of pasiklus to an increase of 6 digits (7.2%). Data from pre cycle lowest value of 64, the first cycle of 70, and the second cycle of 74. There was an increase in the lowest value of pre cycle to the first cycle of six digits (9.4%), from the first cycle to the second cycle an increase of 6 digits ( 8.6%), and the second cycle of pasiklus to an increase of 12 digits (18.8%). Percentage of learning achievement obtained in pre cycle by 41% and in the first cycle by 78% and the second cycle of 100%. Growth pre cycle character from the first cycle to an increase in class achievement by 37%, from the first cycle to the second cycle there is an increase of 22%, and from pre cycle to the second cycle there is an increase of 59%. This means that the cultivation of character (character education) learners in mathematics from pre cycle until the second cycle there is a significant rise. Thus, it can be affirmed that the approach can optimize the consrtructivism cultivating of character.

Keywords

cultivation of character; constructivism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adrian, 2004. ”Metode Mengajar Berdasarkan Tipologi Belajar Peserta didik”, 20 Oktober 2004. http://www.wordpress.com.

Adnyana, Gede Putra. 2005. Meningkatkan Kualitas Aktivitas Belajar, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Dan Pemahaman Konsep Biologi Siswa Kelas X-5 SMA Negeri 1 Banjar Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Gulo,W. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. http:www. putradnyana-ptk.

blogspot.com.

Arvio, Idham. 2012. “Pengertian Prestasi Belajar”. http://education-vionet. blogspot.com

Astuti, 2012. “Motivasi Berprestasi”. http://stoety.wordpress.com.

Bahar, Haris. 2012. “Motivasi Berprestasi”. http:// harisbahar.blogspot.com .

BSNP. 2007. Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar Untuk SMP/MTs Kurikulum Tingkat

Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta : BSNP.

Darsono, Max, 2000. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yoyakarta: IKIP Yogyakarta Press..

Depdiknas. 2003. Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Biologi Sekolah Menengah Pertama.Jakarta.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2004. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Jihad, Asep; Muchlas Rawi; dan Noer Komarudin. 2010. Pendidikan Karakter Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Direktorat Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Nasution S., 2002. Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jakarta : P.T. C.V. Bina Aksara.

Sardiman, 1980. Psikologi Belajar. Yogjakarta : Andi Offdset.

Slavin, R.E. 1994. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (4th Edition). Boston: Allyn

and Bacon

Setyarini, M. 2007. Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Melalui Model Cooperative LearningTipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Kimia (PTK Di Kelas XI IPA SMAN 5 Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2006/2007. http://www.scribd.com/

Sudrajat, Akhmad, 2008: 4. Strategi Pembelajaran. http://akhmadsudrajat. wordpress.com/

Sudrajat, Akhmad, 2011. “Menjadi Guru Berkarakter”. http://akhmadsudrajat.Wordpress.com

Surianto. 2009. “Teori-Pembelajaran-Konstruktivisme”. http://surianto200477. wordpress.com/

Suwandi, Sarwiji. 2009. Modul Pendidikan dan Latihan Profesi Guru : Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Surakarta : UNS.

Syarifah, Maimunah Binti Syed Zin. 2011. “Pembelajaran Secara Konstuktivisme”. http://www.moe.gov.my/bpk/bsk/bpanduan/ konstruktivisme.pdf.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Yanto. 2009. Model Belajar Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) (Perspektif Vygotsky). http:// digilib.sunan-ampel.ac.id.

Yudi, 2011. “Pengertian Makna Pendidikan Karakter”. http://yudinet.com

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 158 time(s)
PDF: 110 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.