NILAI-NILAI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DALAM TATA RIAS WAJAH PUNAKAWAN WAYANG ORANG SRIWEDARI SURAKARTA

Sabar narimo

Abstract

The objectives of the research are: (1) to know make up characteristics of Punakawan Human Puppet of Sriwedari Surakarta; (2) to know symbolic meanings of Punakawan make up of Human Puppet of Sriwedari Surakarta; and (3) to know characters building values in Punakawan make up of Human Puppet of Sriwedari Surakarta. The result shows that the characteristics of Semar make up describe Semar as wise, calm, and religious personality. the characteristics of Gareng make up describes Semar as talk less and honest personality. The characteristics of Semar make up describes Petruk as dynamic and caring personality. The characteristics of Bagong make up describes Bagong as stubborn, creative, an, and optimistic. Character building values in Semar make up are religious, peaceful, honesty, and nasionalism. Character building values in Gareng make up are honesty, peaceful, and nasionalism. Character building values in Petruk make up are communicative, peaceful, and optimistic, and Character building values in Bagong make up are curiousity, dynamic and creative. 

Keywords

values, character building, make up, and human puppet

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akhwan, Muzhoffar. 2011. Pendidikan Karakter: Konsep dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran di Sekolah/Madrasah. Makalah dipersiapkan dan disajikan dalam diskusi dosen Fakultas Ilmu Agama Islam UII, tanggal 2 Nopember 2011.

Ardian Kresna. 2012. Punakawa: Simbol Kerendahan Hati Orang Jawa. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Narasi.

Basuki R. 2006. “Panakawan’s Discaurse of Power in Javanese Shadow Pupet During The Order Regine: From Tradisional Perspektif to New Historicism”. Petra Christian University: English Departement.

Cassires, E, 1994, An Essay on Man: An Introduction to-A- Philosophy of Human Culture, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Helen P. 2004. ”President as Punakawan: Portrayal of National Leaders as Clown – Servant in Central Javanese Wayang”. Jurnal of Southear Asia Studien. The National University of Singapore.

Moleong, L., J. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyono. S. 1989. Simbolisme dan Mistikisme dalam Wayang. Jakarta : Pertja.

Nanik S.S. 2001. “ Warna, Garis, dan Bentuk Ragam Hias dalam Tata Rias dan Tata Busana Wayang Wong Sriwedari Surakarta Sebagai Sarana Ekspresi”. Dalam Jurnal Harmonia Vol 2 no 3 September – Desember 2001 Surakarta: UNS

Patton, M.Q. 2009. Metode Evaluasi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sainah, 2010. “Tokoh dan Fungsi Punokawan Wayang Orang Ngesti Pandowo di Semarang” Skripsi S-1. Jurusan Seni Drama, Tari, dan Musik Fakultas, Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Sudiro. 2002. “Kesenian Wayang Orang dan Fungsinya. The art of wayang orang and its Fuanction” dalam Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora Vol.3 n0.1 edisi Februari. Surakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UMS

Sugiyono. 2013. Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Article Level Metrics

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.