Pre-service teacher’s mathematical knowledge for teaching in problem-based learning

Ifada Novikasari(1*)

(1) Tadris Matematika, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author


Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT), comprising Mathematics Content Knowledge (MCK) and Mathematics Pedagogy Content Knowledge (MPCK), is essential for pre-service teachers. However, numerous studies have shown that pre-service teachers are weak in content and difficult to plan to teach. Therefore, a shifting effort dealing with the learning activities within the teacher training program from a teacher-centered to student-centered approach should be made. One learning model succeeding in the student-centered approach is Problem-Based Learning (PBL). Studies on PBL as an effort to improve the MCK and MPCK of pre-service teachers have never been done before. There were two models of PBL applied in this experimental study: PBL with authentic problems (PBL1) and PBL with authentic problems and teaching practices (PBL2). The aspects of MCK studied are knowing, applying, and reasoning. While the aspects of MPCK are creating representation for the explanation, understanding mathematical structures, and anticipating students' thinking. The results of the study showed that there were significant differences between MCK and MPCK achievements in PBL1, PBL2, and conventional learning classes conventional. PBL1 and PBL2 classes were considered superiors since the pre-service teachers predominantly control the learning activities and were active in finding solutions. Hence, there were differences in the effect of the learning models on the aspects of MCK and MPCK.


Problem-based learning, mathematics content knowledge, mathematics pedagogy content knowledge

Full Text:



Bacon, D. R., & Stewart, K. A. (2006). How fast do students forget what they learn in consumer behavior? A longitudinal study. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(3), 181–192.

Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing Mathematics for Teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17. Retrieved from

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

Cai, J., Jakabcsin, M. S., & Lane, S. (1996). Assessing Students’ Mathematical Communication. School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 238–246.

Cheang, W. K., Yeo, J. K. K., Chan, E. C. M., & Lim-Teo, S. K. (2007). Development of Mathematics Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Student Teachers. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 27–54. Retrieved from

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. In Routledge. London: Routledge.

Corcoran, T. (1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. In CPRE Policy Briefs /Consortium for Policy Research in Education. New Brunswick: NJ Rutgers.

Darling-hammond, L., & National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future (U.S.). (1997). Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Quality Teaching. Retrieved from

Duch, B. J. (2001). Model for Problem-Based Instruction in Undergraduate Courses. In Barbara J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Erickson, D. (1999). A Problem-Based Approach to Mathematics Instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 92(6), 516–521. Retrieved from

Grevholm, B., Millman, R., & Clarke, B. (2009). Function, Form and Focus: The Role of Tasks in Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education. In B. Clarke, B. Grevholm, & R. Millman (Eds.), Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education (4th ed.).

Gunawan, I. (2017). Indonesian Curriculum 2013: Instructional Management, Obstacles Faced by Teachers in Implementation and the Way Forward. 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017).

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective 7th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. Retrieved from

Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.

Kennedy, M. (1999). The problem of evidence in teacher education. In R. Roth (Ed.), The role of the university in the preparation of teachers (pp. 87–107). Philadelpia: Falmer.

Levin, B. B. (2001). Energizing Teacher Education and Professional Development with Problem-Based Learning. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Lubienski, S. T. (1999). Problem-Centered Mathematics Teaching. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(4), 250–255. Retrieved from

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Major, T., & Mulvihill, T. M. (2018). Problem-based learning pedagogies in teacher education: The case of Botswana. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1).

Martin, D. A., Grimbeek, P., & Jamieson-Proctor, R. (2013). Measuring problem-based learning’s impact on pre-service teachers’ mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Proceedings of the 2nd International Higher Education Teaching And Learning Conference (IEAA 2013). Retrieved from

Martin, L. E., & Mulvihill, T. M. (2019). Voices in Education: Teacher Self-Efficacy in Education. Teacher Educator, 54(3), 195–205.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., Arora, A., & Erberber, E. (2005). TIMSS 2007 Assessment Frameworks. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.

Mulyanto, H., Gunarhadi, G., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes Viewed from Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(3), 37–45.

Ortiz-Ordoñez, J. C., Stoller, F., & Remmele, B. (2015). Promoting Self-confidence, Motivation and Sustainable Learning Skills in Basic Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 982–986.

Otun, W. I., & Olaoye, A. A. (2019). Enhancing the Conceptual, Procedural and Flexible Procedural Knowledge of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Algebra. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 66–78.

Petrou, M., & Goulding, M. (2011). Conceptualising Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical Knowledge in Teaching (pp. 9–25).

Pinilla, M. I. F. (2007). Fractions: conceptual and didactic aspects. Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae, (7), 81–115. Retrieved from

Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and Using the ‘Knowledge Quartet’: A Framework for the Observation of Mathematics Teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–123.

Savin-Baden, M. (2003). Facilitating Problem‐Based Learning. In The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning. Philadelpia: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a Theory of Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education (Second Edition) (Vol. 2, pp. 321–354).

Senk, S. L., Peck, R., Bankov, K., & Tatto, M. T. (2008). Conceptualizing and measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching: Issues from TEDS-M, an IEA Cross-National Study. Paper Prepared for Topic Study Group 27 (Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching) of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education, pp. 1–15. Retrieved from

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. 0013189X015002004

Skott, J. (2019). Understanding mathematics teaching and learning “in their full complexity.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22, 427–431.

Sorge, S., Kröger, J., Petersen, S., & Neumann, K. (2019). Structure and development of pre-service physics teachers’ professional knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 862–889.

Sullivan, P. (2011). Australian Education Review Teaching Mathematics : Using research-informed strategies. In Australian Council for Educational Research. Camberwell: Vic: ACER Press.

Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M) Conceptual framework. East Lansing, MI: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center: College of Education, Michigan State University.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 84 time(s)
PDF: 59 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.