A design approach to mathematics teacher educator development in East Africa

Jennie Golding(1*), Marjorie Sarah K. Batiibwe(2)

(1) Institute of Education, University College London,
(2) Department of Science, Technical and Vocational Education, Makerere University, Kampala
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Mathematical functioning in sub-Saharan Africa remains persistently weak in global terms. This limits the flourishing of young people and communities in the region. Moreover, affordable, effective ways to address the issue are not well established. This paper analyses outcomes from a blended learning ‘Mathematical Thinking and IT’ course, iteratively adapted for East African primary mathematics teacher educators. The course adopted theoretical approaches derived from the mathematics, teacher and technology education literatures. It aimed to address the problem of low mathematical functioning by equipping participants for their own work, and also for supporting local collaborative teacher development workshops. The reported study asked, ‘What are the affordances and constraints of the adapted course and the available technology for mathematics teacher educator development in this context?’A variety of qualitative tools were used to track the course’s impact on the ten mathematics teacher educator participants over six months, as they attempted to transfer course learning to their home professional context. The analysis adopted an ethnographic lens. Outcomes suggested participants with a broad mathematical and pedagogical capacity for change, including critical levels of reflection, made significant progress in their technological, mathematical and mathematics pedagogical expertise. However, teacher educators without such a threshold capacity appeared not able to re-envision practice. Free subject-specific software was appreciated by all participants, but not yet reliably accessible in these teacher educators’ institutional contexts. The reported study evidences the potential for affordable, sustainable, development of many mathematics teacher educators in this context, but further research is needed. Similar courses should take account of local technological and education constraints

Keywords

distance learning; East Africa; mathematics teacher educator; primary mathematics; technology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adler, J., & Davis, Z. (2006). Opening another black box: Researching mathematics for teaching in teacher education mathematics knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 270- 296. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034851

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16 - 25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Asongu, S. &Odhiambo, N. (2019). Basic formal education quality, information technology, and inclusive human development in sub‐Saharan Africa. Sustainable Development, 27(3), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1914

Golding, J. (2017). Mathematics teacher capacity for change. Oxford Review of Education, 43(4), 502- 517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1331846

Golding, J., & Bretscher, N. (2018). Developing pedagogies for a synchronous online course on teaching pre-university mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 37(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry010

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389- 407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Bethell, G. (2016). Mathematics education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities. World Bank. Report No: ACS19117. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/538251476977591230/pdf/ACS19117-V2-Version-2-Full-report-final-P152990-PUBLIC.pdf

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Dreeseni, T., Akseer, S., Brossard, M., Dewan, P., Giraldo, J-P., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S. & Ortiz, J. (2020). Promising practices for equitable remote learning. Florence: UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/IRB%202020-10.pdf

Eurydice.(2011). Mathematics education in Europe: Common challenges and national policies. EACEA. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3532f22d-eea2-4bb2-941b-959ddec61810/language-en

Halai, A., & Tennant, G. (Eds.) (2016). Mathematics education in East Africa: Towards harmonisation and enhancement of education quality. Springer: Dordrecht. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-27258-0

Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R., & Brown, M. (2018). Improving mathematics in key stages two and three: evidence review. London: Education Endowment Foundation. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/evidencereviews/improving-mathematics-in-key-stages-two-and-three/

Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259.

Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209- 228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799

Jaworski, B., & Wood, T. (Eds.) (2008).The mathematics MTE as a developing professional. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam.

Joubert, M., & Kenny, S. (2018). Exploring the perspectives of participants in two mathematics professional development courses in South Africa. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), 319- 328. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1525093

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T.C. (2014). Educational design research. In Spector J., Merrill M., Elen J., Bishop M. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY, pp.131-140.

Mercer, J. (2007). The challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094651

Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017- 1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 31(1), 32- 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.001

Walter, C., & Briggs, J. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11898

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 400 time(s)
PDF: 395 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.