Prophetical Law Paradigm: A Synthesis Of Thoughts Of Legal Philosophy Development

Catur Yunianto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v1i2.9154

Abstract

ABSTRACT

 

Purpose: This article aims to explain the philosophy dialectics of positivistic law and post positivistic law and elaborate on the dialectics of synthesis of thoughts of prophetic legal.

 

Methodology: This research used a philosophical approach. The data were taken from secondary data using primary and secondary legal materials. The data were presented in an analytical descriptive manner, then analyzed in a normative juridical manner.

 

Finding: The development of legal philosophy as an art of thought between empiricism, reality, rationality, and irrationality. Integration must be in presence to find the legal synthesis which is perceived capable of providing answers to the missing synthesis concerning the law. The basis of integration is conducted by retrieving the history and the thought schools development of natural philosophy, positivistic, non-systematic law and prophetic law. The synthesis of the thought schools of philosophical law is not only a reality built from the law itself but also the existence of extracurricular nullifications that can be synergized into near-perfect law.

 

Benefit: The benefit of this research is to present the phenomena of various legal paradigms that develop simultaneously as a synthesis of legal development and as an answer to various problems of legal philosophy. The positivistic, non-systematic synthesis and the prophetic paradigm are the paths to near-perfect truth.

 

Originality/Novelty: The prophetic paradigm developed within the framework of micro and macro realities are considered capable of providing answers to the reality of various criticisms that have existed so far. This prophetic paradigm has bonded micro, macro and transcendent realities which are divided into three categories; Theology, Humanity and Natural Sciences which are based on God’s verses on the Qur'an and Sunnah.

 

Keyword: Philosophy of Law, Synthesis, Prophetic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Absori et al. 2018. Hukum Profetik Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Hukum Non-Sistematik. Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

----------, 2015. Epistimologi Hukum Transedental dan Implementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum. Prosiding Seminar Nasional April 2015 di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

---------. 2018. Kritik Terhadap Paradigma hukum Non Sistematik. Materi Kuliah Filsafat Hukum Program Pascasarja UMS.

Bakir, Herman. 2005. Kastil Teori Hukum, PT Indeks kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.

Bakhtiar, Amsal. 1997. Filsafat Agama, Logos, Jakarta.

Diane Collinson, 2001. Lima Puluh Filosof Dunia yang Menggerakkan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dwi Putro, Widodo. 2011. Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Posivisme Hukum. Genta Publishing; Yogyakarta.

FX. Adji Samekto. Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Positivisme Dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 12. No. 1. 1 Januari 2012.

Ghofur Anshori, Abdul. 2006. Filsafat Hukum, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Hossein Nasr, Sayyed. 1983. Islam dan Nestapa Manusia Modern. Pustaka. Bandung.

Mr. Soetikno.2003.Filsafat Hukum Bagian 2. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

Mr. Soetikno.2003.Filsafat Hukum Bagian 1. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta.

M, Hajar. Dialektika antara Aliran Hukum Alam dan Hukum Positif dan Relevansi dengan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM NO. 4 VOL. 20 OKTOBER 2013: 563 - 579

Munif Suratmaputra, Ahmad.2002. Filsafat Hukum Islam Al-Ghazali, Masalah Musalah dan relevansinya dengan pemharuan hukum Islam. Pustaka Firdaus. Jakarta.

Prasetyo, Teguh et all. 2006. Ilmu Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum Studi Pemikiran Ahli Hukum Sepanjang Zaman. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Suharto. Bekti Menyoal Sudut Pandang: Kritik Terhadap Epistemologi Positivisme Hukum. Prosiding seminar nasional.

Sumaryono, E. 2002. Etika Hukum Relevansi Teori Hukum Kodrat Thomas Aquinas. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Susanto, Anthon F.. 2010. Ilmu Hukum Non Sistematik “Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia” Genta Publishing; Yogyakarta.

------------------------. 2010. Dekonstruksi Hukum “Eksplorasi Tesk dan Model Pembacaan” Genta Publishing; Yogyakarta.

Syukri Albani Nasution, Muhammad, et all. 2015. Hukum Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat. Kecana. Jakarta.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 106 time(s)
PDF: 73 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.