PERBANDINGAN PENGISIAN JABATAN HAKIM ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN JEPANG

Haris Kurnia Anjasmana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jjr.v9i2.8726

Abstract

To produce judges with integrity, professionalism and legal mastery, of course the initial steps are determined by how the judicial filling mechanism is filled. The mechanism for filling judges in Indonesia is experiencing problems because it is not regulated in the judicial power law, only regulated through a Supreme Court Regulation. Plus the still unclear institution that has the authority to do the selection of judges. Japan itself has a procedure to fill a judge's office which is considered one of the best, where the selection can be done through a special school of judges, or a state exam. So it's interesting to compare the filling positions between Indonesia and Japan. Which become the orderly compationis is which institution has the authority to conduct a selection of judges, how about the mechanism to fill a judge's office, as for what identifies the problem in this paper is whether the institution authorized to conduct the selection of first-level judges in Indonesia and Japan is credible or not? second: to what extent are the mechanisms for filling judges in Indonesia and Japan able to produce qualified and integrity judges?

 

Keywords: Filling, recruitment, judge, quality, Japan

 

Keywords

Filling, recruitment, judge, quality, Japan

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

• Buku

Abraham Amos, Katastropi Hukum Dan Quo Vadis Sistem Politik Peradilan Di Indonesia, PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.

Bambang Sutitoso, Sri Hastuti Puspitasari, Aspek-aspek perkembangan kekuasaan kehakiman di Indonesia, UII Press Yogyakarta, 2005.

Komisi Yudisial, Bunga Rampai Komisi Yudisial, Meluruskan Arah Manajemen Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial, 2018.

PSKN FH UNPAD , Negara Hukum Yang Berkeadilan” Kumpulan Tulisan Dalam Rangka Purnabakti Prof. Dr. H. Bagir Manan, S.H.,M.CL., 2011

Rimdan, Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi, Kencana, Jakarta, 2012.

Saldi Isra, Sistem Rekruitmen Hakim Dan Pengangkatan Hakim Agung Dan Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Konsepsi Negara Hukum, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2014.

• Artikel, Majalah, Jurnal

Laporan Kunjungan Kerja Komisi Yudisial dan Penjajakan Kerjasama dengan International Cooperation Department, The Research and Training Institute of Ministry of Justice dan Legal Training and Research Institute, Supreme Court of Japan pada tanggal 22 s.d 28 November 2015.

J. Mark ramseyer & Eric B. Rasmusen, The Case For Managed Judges: Learning From Japan After The Political Upheaval Of 1993 ,University Of Pennsylvania Law Review vol. 154: 1879

Mahkamah Agung, Kertas Kerja Pembaruan Sistem Pembinaan SDM Hakim, Jakarta, 2002.

Susi Dwi Harijanti, Pengisian Jabatan Hakim: Kebutuhan Reformasi dan Pengekangan Diri, dimuat di Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM no. 4 vol. 21 Oktober 2014

• Internet

https://geotimes.co.id/kolom/hukum/mengurai-polemik-rekrutmen-hakim/ diakses Selasa,22 Mei 2018.

https://antikorupsi.org/id/news/kawal-perekrutan-hakim diakses 12 Januari 2019.

https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seleksi-dan-gaji-hakim-jepang-terungkap-di-pa-depok diakses 17 Juni 2019.

https://japan.kantei.go.jp/judiciary/0620system.html diakses 13 Juni 2019.

http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/japaneselaw/2010/04/judicial_education.html diakses 10 Juni 2019

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 160 time(s)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia): 240 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.