Legal Analysis of Shareholders as an Organ of The Company Viewed From Commercial Code

Prasasti Dyah Nugraheni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v5i2.9808

Abstract

This paper aims to explain the authority possessed by the members of Shareholders in the Articles of Association. In Articles of Association of Limited Liability Company, it contains regulations governing an operational activity that will become the purpose of Limited Liability Company. The Articles of Association have compelling and binding nature for all members of Shareholders, all members of the Board of Commissioners, and all members of the Board of Directors. Members of Shareholders are an organ owned by Limited Liability Company whose authority owned by all members of the Board of Commissioners and all members of the Board of Directors. One of the authorities possessed by the members of Shareholders is to appoint the members of the Board of Commissioners and members of the Board of Directors. In this paper, the author used research methods of normative and juridical, meaning that the writing method is carried out by analyzing secondary legal materials or library materials to find solutions to problems of legal problems arising and to use a problem approach based on laws or legal rules in general about the powers of the shareholders that apply to such event and approach the problem based on a conceptual basis. The results show that the position of the shareholders is not higher than and even equal to the position of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors. Whereas in the Indonesian Commercial Code, it stipulates that the position of shareholders is the highest in a Limited Liability Company.

Keywords: Authority of Shareholders; Company Law Number 40 of 2007; Limited Liability Company

Keywords

Authority of Shareholders; Company Law Number 40 of 2007; Limited Liability Company

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amanat, A. (1996). Pembahasan Undang – Undang Perseroan Terbatas Tahun 1995 dan Penerapannya Dalam Akta Notaris. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Davies, P. L. (2003). Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law. Thomson Sweet and Maxwell.

Sjawie, H. F. (2013). Direksi dari Perseroan Terbatas dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Ed. 3. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Subekti dan Tjitrosudibio. (2011). Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Dagang (KUHD) dan Undang –Undang Kepailitan. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Supramono, G. (1996). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (PT) yang Baru. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Usman, M. dkk. (1990). Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Perbankan Indonesia atau Institut Bankir Indonesia dan Ikatan Sarjana Ekonomi DKI Jaya.

Widjaya, I. G. Rai. (2002). Hukum Perusahaan. Jakarta: Megapoin Kesaint Blanc.

Kurniawan. (2014). Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum Positif. Jurnal UGM. (26)1.

Prabowo, M. S. (2018). The Existence of A Company in The Society And Its Legality in Indonesian Law. Journal of Private and Commercial Law Unnes. (2)1.

Wibisono, O. M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Keputusan Circular Resolution dari Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dalam Pemberhentian Direksi. Jurnal Perspektif. 23(3).

Yuwono, M. Y. (2015). Perkembangan Kewenangan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Jurnal Undip. (8)2.

The Republic Indonesia. 2007. Law Number 40 of Year 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (PT). Republic Indonesia State Gazette 2007, Number 106. Secretariat of State. Jakarta.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 54 time(s)
PDF: 29 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.