Strategi Think Pair Share dan Jigsaw: Manakah yang Lebih Efektif untuk Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa?

Arief Cahyo Utomo(1*), Zaenal Abidin(2), Henry Aditia Rigianti(3)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(3) Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to find out the different of efectiveness of Think Pair Share (TPS) and Jigsaw learning model on problem solving ability of 6th grade students. This study compared which has a greater effect on problem solving ability of 6th grade students. This study was a quasy experiment. The subjects of this study were 6th grade elementary school students in Ngadirojo Kidul, Wonogiri, Indonesia. Data collection used were pretest and post test technique. Data analysis used was Anova with T-test where previously preceded by prerequisite test (homogenity test and normality test). The result of this study is there is difference between TPS learning model and Jigsaw learning model. TPS learning model has a greater influence in improving problem solving ability of 6th grade elementary school students.

Keywords

Think Pair Share, Jigsaw, Problem Solving

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aronson, Elliot, dan Diane Bridgeman. (1979). “Jigsaw Groups dan The Desegregated Classroom: In Pursuit of Common Goals.” Personality dan Social Psychology Bulletin 5(4): 438–46. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014616727900500405.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2013). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gok, Tolga. (2018). “The Evaluation of Conceptual Learning dan Epistemological Beliefs on Physics Learning by Think-Pair-Share.” Journal of Education in Science, Environment dan Health 4(1): 69–80.DOI: 10.21891/jeseh.387489

Hedeen, Timothy. (2003). “The Reverse Jigsaw: A Process of Cooperative Learning dan Discussion.” Teaching Sociology 31(3): 325–32.DOI 10.2307/3211330

Husna et al. (2013). “Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think-Pair-Share (Tps) Magister Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjana Unsyiah Banda Aceh 2).” Jurnal Peluang. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/peluang/article/view/1061/997

Johnson, David W., dan Roger T. Johnson. (1999). “Making Cooperative Learning Work.” Theory into Practice 38(2): 67–73. DOI: 10.1080/00405849909543834

Kothiyal, Aditi, Rwitajit Majumdar, Sahana Murthy, dan Sridhar Iyer. (2013). “Effect of Think-Pair-Share in a Large CS1 Class: 83% Sustained Engagement.” ICER 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research: 137–44.DOI: 10.1145/2493394.2493408

Kusuma, Ardi Wira. (2018). “Meningkatkan Kerjasama Siswa Dengan Metode Jigsaw.” Konselor 7(1): 26–30. DOI: 10.24036/02018718458-0-00

Liao, Soohyun Nam, William G. Griswold, dan Leo Porter. (2018). “Classroom Experience Report on Jigsaw Learning.” Annual Conference on Innovation dan Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE: 302–7.DOI: 10.1145/3197091.3197118

Martalena. (2016). “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Siswa Kelas V Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw.” Jurnal Educatio 2(1): 52–58.DOI: 10.29210/12016232

Martha, Chianson, O’kwu Emmanuel, dan Kurumeh Seraphina. (2015). “Effect of Think-Pair-Share Strategy on Secondary School Mathematics Students’ Achievement dan Academic Self-Esteem in Fractions.” Aijcsr 2(2): 141–47.http://www.aijcsr.com/index.php/aij/article/view/71

Mattingly, Robert M, dan Ronald L Vansickle. (1991). “The Attainment Of Social Studies With A Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model.” Journal Resume 22(33): 348–267.http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED348267

Rifa’i, A., dan H. P. Lestari. (2018). “The Effect of Think Pair Share (TPS) Using Scientific Approach on Students’ Self-Confidence dan Mathematical Problem-Solving.” In Journal of Physics: Conference Series,.DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/9983/1/012084

Schoenfeld, Alan H. (2016). “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, dan Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint).” Journal of Education 196(2): 1–38.DOI: 10.1177/002205741619600202

Tamah, Siti Mina. (2007). “Jigsaw Technique In Reading Class Of Young Learners: Revealing Students’ Interaction.” Online Submission. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/107

Tint, San San, dan Ei Ei Nyunt. (2015). “Collaborative Learning with Think-Pair -Share Technique.” Computer Applications: An International Journal 2(1): 1–11.DOI: 10.5121/caij.2015.2101

Umam, Syaiful Rohim dan Khoerul. (2019). “The Effect Of Problem-Posing dan Think-Pair-Share Learning Models On Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills dan Mathematical Communication Skills.” 4(3): 287–91.DOI: 10.26737/jetl.v4i2.803

Mulyadi dan Risminawati. (2012). Model – model Pembelajaran Inovatif di Sekolah Dasar. Surakarta : BP – FKIP UMS.

Surtikanti dan Joko Santoso. (2009). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Surakarta: BP-FKIP UMS.

Yanti. (2014). “Peningkatan Keaktifan Dalam Hasil pemecahan masalah Materi Lingkungan Alam Dan Buatan Melalui Metode Problem Based Intruction (PBI) Pada Siswa Kelas III Semester I SDN 3 Grobogan Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014”. Skripsi. Surakarta:FKIP UMS (tidak diterbitkan).

Zaini dkk. (2007). Staretgi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: CTSD (Center for Teaching Staff Development).

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 53 time(s)
PDF: 44 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.