PENGARUH METODE DISKUSI KELOMPOK DALAM EVALUASI HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN MINDMAP

Satrianawati Satrianawati(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aims of this research is to describe the influuence of group discussion method in the evaluation of
university student’s learning output using mind-map strategy in the direction of “bangun ruang, kubus,
balok, prisma, tabung” to university student level V PGSD UAD Yogyakarta. This is experimental
design with the model of two group pretest-posttest design. The number of population are all of students
from three class (VA, VB, VC), with random sampling from three class and the samples was 44 students
from class VC. The techniques for collecting data were test with mind map product after student’s
discussion in the group discussion. Data were collected from instrument of assessment output learning
of mathematic analyzed with descriptive quantitative method. the result shows score of output learning
over all in good category and exceed the minimum grades (KKM) were agreed. Because 80% of
university students got minimum scorer in the good category. The result of t score obtained was 390,58
> the t table was 2,000 with significance 5%, its means the hypothesis is accepted. It’s shows the influence
of group discussion method in the evaluation of university student’s learning output using mind-map
strategy measurable cognition levels C1 and C2 university student in the direction of “bangun ruang,
kubus, balok, prisma,and tabung”

Keywords

output learning, group discussion, mind map

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, L.W. &Krathwohl, D.R. 2010.Pembelajaran, pengajarandanasesmen.

(TerjemahanAgungPrihantoro). Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar. (Bukuasliditerbitkantahun 1956).

Cresswell, J.W. 2013. Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. (Terjemahan

Achmad Fawaid). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2010)

Prastowo, A. 2013. Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.

Sugiyono. 2012. Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 350 time(s)
PDF: 1144 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.