BAHASA AKUNTANSI SEBAGAI “DISCOURSE-DRIVEN” DALAM BUDAYA KAPITALISME BARU

Banu Witono(1*)

(1) Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

It is undeniable that accounting as a science or practice developed at this time considered to be born of the "womb" of capitalism, also led to the development of accounting theory is consistent  with  capitalism itself.  This  article highlights  the dialectic accounting  laden with cultural values contained therein. A study of discourse is used to generate an understanding of how the language has become a 'discourse-driven' to the new capitalism in order to generate the values in a culture where accounting flourish. The basic concepts and theories developed in accounting has become a tool of technology which is used as a justification of the interests in favor of the neo-capitalist.

 

 

Keywords: Accounting Language, Discourse-Driven, Neo-capitalism

Full Text:

PDF

References

Burrell, Gibson dan Gareth Morgan. 1979. SociologicalParadigms and OrganisationalAnalysis: Elements of the Sociology ofCorporate Life. London: Heinemann.

Chiapello, Eve. 2003. Accounting and the Birth ofthe Notion of Capitalism. Tersedia dihttp://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2003/proceedings/criticalaccounting/Chiapello.pdf. Diakses tanggal 16 Januari 2014.

Chua, Wai Fong. 1986. Radical Developments inAccounting Thought. The Accounting ReviewLXI (4), pp.601-32.

Eriksson, Paivi and Anne Kovalainen (2008).Qualitative Methods in Business Research.Sage Publication, City Road London.

Fairclough, Norman 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis. Young (Ed). Systemic Linguistic and Critical Discourse Analysis.

Francis, Jere., 1990. After Virtue?Accounting as a Moral and Discursive Practice.Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 3 (3) ; 5-17

Gioia, Dennis A. and Evelyn Pitre, 1990. Multiparadigm Perspective on Theory Building. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 584.

Harahap, Sofyan S. 1997. Akuntansi Islam. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Harahap, Sofyan S. 2001. Menuju Perumusan Teori Akuntansi Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Quantum.

Harahap, Sofyan S. 2007. Krisis Akuntansi Kapitalisdan Peluang Akuntansi Syariah. Jakarta.Penerbit Pustaka Kuantum.

Hines, Ruth D. 1989. The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research, Accounting, Organizations and Society 2(2); 72-92

Kam, Vernon. 1990. Accounting Theory (2ndedition). Canada: John Wiley & Sons.

Mathews, MR and MHB Perera., 1993, Accounting Theory and Development. Melbourne, Thomas Nelson Australia

Rizky, Awalil & Majidi. 2008. Neoliberalisme Mencengkeram Indonesia. Jakarta: E-Publishing.

Salam, Muslim, 2011. Dialog Paradigma Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Penerbit Masagene Press. Makasar.

Suwarjono, Tjiptohadi, 2005. Bahasa Akuntansi Dalam Praktek: Sebuah Critical Study. Tema, volume 6, nomer 2, hal. 89-110.

Tricker, Robert Ian, 1978. The Independent Director. Tolley ISBN 0 510-49378-5.

Triyuwono, Iwan., 2006, AkuntansiSyariah, PT. Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta.

Triyuwono, Iwan. 2007. Mengangkat “Sing Liyan” untuk Formulasi Nilai Tambah Syariah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma. (Volume 1, Nomor 1, April 2010, 161-162).

Triyuwono, Iwan. 2009. Perspektif, Metodologi, dan Teori Akuntansi Syariah. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Wolk, Harry I and Michael G. Tearney,1997. Accounting Theory A Conceptual and Institutional Approach. Fourth edition, South-Western Collage Publish.

DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v1i2.2733

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 677 time(s)
PDF: 854 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.