Faktor Keperilakuan dan Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik: Peran Niat sebagai Variabel Mediasi

Rika Candra Wandayu(1*), Bambang Purnomosidhi(2), Abdul Ghofar(3)

(1) 
(2) Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya
(3) Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Brawijaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of rationalization reflected using the Theory of Planned Behavior and students' ethical beliefs about the intention to commit academic fraud. In addition, it examines the influence of pressure, intentions, and opportunities on academic fraud. The data of this study was obtained by distributing 229 pieces of questionnaire to Postgraduate students of  Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University Malang who know about academic fraud. This study uses WarpPLS in assessing the validity and the reliability of the data. The results show that rationalization has a negative effect on students 'intentions to commit academic fraud even though rationalization is high. However, it does not influence students' intention to commit fraud because of the high ethical beliefs of students that affect the fraudulency. In addition, even though rationalization has no effect, students receive high pressure and have big opportunities to commit fraud, so the intention to commit fraud arises, making academic fraud possible to happen.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajzen, I. 1988. The Theory of Planned Behavior.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision

Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.

Bahiroh, L. & Kamayanti, A. (2015) “Persepsi

Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi Atas Praktik

Akuntansi Kreatif ”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa

FEB UB.

Beck, L. & Ajzen, I. (1991) “Predicting Dishonest

Actions Using The Theory Of Planned

Behavior”. Journal of Research in Personality,

, 285-301.

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., Morrison, J.

(2006) “Using The Business Fraud Triangle To

Predict Academic Dishonesty Among Business

Students”. Academy of Educational Leadership

Journal, 10(1), 37.

Buskist, W., & Stephen F.D. (2006). Handbook

of The Teaching of Psychology. Blackwell

Publishing Ltd. USA. Diakses dari https://books.

google. hl=id&lr=&id= g497KBFfDqYC&oi

= fnd&pg =PA238&dq= Preventing,+

detecting,+and +addressing + academic+

dishonesty&ots = 0kLcVSat3Y&sig= qn6ITR6_

uVIynO7z8JWysb3-h0U&redir_esc = y#v=

onepage&q =Preventing% 2C% 20detecting%

C%20and%20addressing% 20academic %20

dishonesty&f =false pada tanggal 3 Agustus

.

Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., Stolowy, H. (2010)

“Corporate Fraud and Managers’ Behavior:

Evidence from the Press”. Journal of Business

Ethics, 95, 271-315.

Fadli, M. & Djamhuri, A. (2014) “Pengaruh

Kecerdasan Emosional, Kecerdasan Spiritual,

dan Kecerdasan Sosial Terhadap Sikap Etis

Mahasiswa Akuntansi (Studi pada Universitas

Negeri di Kota Malang)”. Jurnal Ilmiah

Mahasiswa FEB UB.

Handayani, Y.T. & Baridwan, Z. (2014)

“Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku

Ketidakjujuran Akademik: Modifikasi Theory

of Planned Behavior”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa

FEB UB.

Harding, T.S., Matthew J.M., Cyntia J.F.,

Carpenter, D.D. (2007) “The Theory of Planned

Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in

Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates”.

Running Head: Theory of Planned Behavior.

Hartono, J. (2008) Sistem Informasi

Keperilakuan. Yogyakarta:Andi.

REFERENSI

Hartono, J. (2010) Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis

Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-Pengalaman.

Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Hsiao, C.H. & Yang, C. (2011). “The Impact

of Professional Unethical Beliefs on Cheating

Intention”. Ethics & Behavior, 21(4), 301 – 316.

Kurniawati, E. (2012) Analisis Faktor-Faktor

yang Mempengaruhi Financial Statement

Fraud dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle.

Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.

Majdid, M. & Irianto, G. (2014) “Eksplorasi

Proses Belajar Mengajar Mata Kuliah Etika

Bisnis dan Profesi (Studi Kasus pada Jurusan

Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Universitas Brawijaya Malang)”. Jurnal Ilmiah

Mahasiswa FEB UB.

Matindas, B. 2010. Mencegah Kecurangan

Akademik. Diakses dari http://budimatindas.

blogspot.com/2010/08/mencegahkecurangan-akademik.html. pada tanggal 29

Juli 2015.

Nursani, R. & Irianto, G. (2014) “Perilaku

Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi

Fraud Diamond”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa

FEB UB.

Park, H. & Blenkinsopp., J. (2009)

“Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A

Survey of South Korean Police Officers”.

Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 545 – 556.

Purnamasari, D. & Irainto, G. (2014) “Analisis

Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle Terhadap

Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa

Pada Saat Ujian dan Metode Pencegahannya”.

Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB UB.

Rohmah, F. (2013) “Kecurangan Dalam Ujian

Nasional di Sekolah Menengah Atas”. Artikel

Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa.

Santoso, M.H. & Adam, H. (2014) “Analisis

Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik pada

Mahasiswa Akuntansi dengan Menggunakan

Konsep Fraud Triangle (Studi pada Mahasiswa

S1 Akuntansi Kota Malang)”. Jurnal Ilmiah

Mahasiswa FEB UB.

Sholihin, M. & Ratmono, D. (2013). Analisis

SEM – PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0. Yogyakarta:

Andi.

Tikollah, M.R., Triyuwono, I., Ludigdo, U.

(2006) “Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual,

Kecerdasan Emosional, dan Kecerdasan

Spiritual Terhadap Sikap Etis Mahasiswa

Akuntansi”. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9

Padang.

Tuanakotta, T.M. (2010) Akuntansi Forensik

& Audit Investigatif (Edisi 2). Jakarta: Salemba

Empat.

Zawawi, Noor, S.H., Mohamed, H., Kamil,

M.I., Abdul, R.R., Yap B.W. (2011) “Antecedents

of Non – Normal Financial Reporting”. The

Special Issue on Contemporary Issues in

Business and Economics.

DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v4i1.7414

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1728 time(s)
PDF: 2466 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.