Industrial Capital Intensity and Comparative Advantages Dynamism of Indonesian Export Products

Ni Putu Wiwin Setyari(1*), Tri Widodo(2), Muhammad Edhie Purnawan(3)

(1) Economics and Business Faculty, Udayana University
(2) Economics and Business Faculty, Gadjah Mada University
(3) Economics and Business Faculty, Gadjah Mada University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The development of new trade theory which incorporates the interaction between trade and international capital flows indicates if the possibility of changes in a country's comparative advantage due to the opening of international capital flows. International capi tal flows allow for changes in the industrial structure of a country depends on the composition of the products produced in that coun try. More capital-intensive types of products produced by a country, the greater the need for capital and the higher marginal rate of capital that can be given to attract greater international capital flows. Therefore, a comparative advantage should be seen as dynamic rather than static. As a country with large population, Indonesia tends to specialize in labor -intensive products. The other hand, efforts to attract foreign direct investment are very intensively conducted. The estimation results indicate if there was a shift in the pattern of industrial specialization Indonesia, from labor –intensive tends toward capital intensive.

Keywords

neoclassical models; capital movements; business; comparative advantage

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aiginger, Karl. 1999. Do Industrial Structures Converge? A Survey on the Empirical Literature on Specialization and Concentration of Industries. Unpublished Working Paper

Balassa, Bela and Marcus Noland. 1989. “Revealed” Comparative Advantage in Japan and the United States. Journal of International Economic Integration 4(2), 1989, 8-22.

Beine, Michel and Serge Coulombe. 2004. Economic Integration and Regional Industrial Specialization Patterns: New Evidence from the Canadian–U.S. FTA Experience.Unplished Working Paper.

Bowen, Harry P., Abraham Hollander, and Jean-Marie Viaene. 2012. Applied International Trade Analysis: 2 nd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Das, Kusum Deb, and Gunajit Kalita. 2009. Do Labor Intensive Industries Generate Employment? Evidence from Firm Level Survey in India. Working Paper No. 237, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

Imbz, Jean and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. Stages of Diversification. The American Economic Review, March 2003, p. 63-86.

Krugman, Paul. 1987. The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease, and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher: Notes on Trade in the Presence of Dynamic Scale Economies. Journal of Development Economics 27 (1987) 41-55.

Lin, Justin and Ha-Joon Chang. 2009. Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy it? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 2009, 27 (5): 483-502

Laursen, Keld. 2015. Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives As Measures of International Specialization. Eurasian Bus Rev (2015) 5:99–115.

Ohno, Koichi, and Hideki Imaoka. 1987. The Experience of Dual-Industrial Growth: Korea and Taiwan. The Developing Economies, Vol. XXV(4): 310-324.

Sanguinetti, Pablo, Iulia Traistaru, and Christian Volpe Martincus. 2004. The Impact of South-South Preferential Trade Agreements on Industrial Development: An Empirical Test. Unplished Working Paper.

Shirotori, Miho, Bolormaa Tumurchudur, and Olivier Cadot. 2010. Revealed Factor Intensity Indices at the Production Level. Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, No. 44.

Tijaja, Julia and Mohammad Faisal. 2014. Industrial Policy in Indonesia: A Global Value Chain Perspective. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 411, October 2014.

Wie, Thee Kian. 2006. Technology and Indonesia’s Industrial Competitiveness. ADB Institute Discussion Paper No. 43, February 2006.

Widodo, Tri. 2009. Dynamic Comparative Advantages in the ASEAN+3. Journal of Economic Integration 24(3), September 2009; 505-529

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1156 time(s)
PDF: 814 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.