Understanding the Political Geography of Power: the Dynamics of Space, Place and Society

Arizka Warganegara(1*), Ahmad Nizamuddin Sulaiman(2)

(1) Department of Government Science University of Lampung
(2) Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Power is an important topics of study in the social sciences. As a concept, power has an intersubjectivity meaning. This paper analyses the various concept of power from the political geography perspective, analyzing the thoughts by four prominent and influential social scientists, Anthony Giddens, Antonio Gramsci, David Beetham, and Michel Foucault. This paper aims to explain how the concept of power has contextualized within the place, space and society’s narrative in modern-day of human life. Furthermore, the concepts of power presented by these four selected thinkers have massively influenced the notion and the discourse of the study of power nowadays. This paper argues that instead of having a different context and discourse as well as paradigm, the concepts of power by those thinkers have a similar way of thinking when looking the dynamics of space and place of the society as the basic principle of their analysis.

Keywords

power; structuration; legitimation; knowledge; hegemony

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References

Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Beetham, D. (1999). Democracy and human rights. Malden, MA; Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Brass, P. R. (2000). Foucault steals political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 305-330. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.305

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Clegg, S., & Haugaard, M. (2009). The SAGE handbook of power. London: SAGE.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Foucault, M., & Faubion, J. D. (2002). Power. London: Penguin.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

Gordon, R. (2009). Power and Legitimacy: From Weber to Contemporary Theory. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of power

London: SAGE.

Gramsci, A. (2000). The Gramsci reader: selected writings, 1916-1935: NYU press.

Halperin, S. (1997). In the mirror of the Third World: capitalist development in modern Europe: Cornell University Press.

Hartley, W. (1984). HEGEMONY AND REVOLUTION - A STUDY OF GRAMSCI,ANTONIO POLITICAL AND CULTURAL THEORY - ADAMSON,WL. Italian Quarterly, 25(97-98), 171-181.

Haugaard, M. (1997). The Constitution of Power: A Theoretical Analysis of Power, Knowledge and Structure: Manchester University Press.

Kaspersen, L. B. (2000). Anthony Giddens: an introduction to a social theorist. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2016). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences: Pearson Higher Ed.

Morriss, P. (2002). Power: a philosophical analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Neill, C. (2010). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 558-560. doi:10.1177/1354067x10380161

Newnham, E. C. (2014). Birth control: Power/knowledge in the politics of birth. Health Sociology Review, 23(3), 254-268.

Parry, G. (1971). Political Elite. Great Britain: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

Simon, R. (1991). Gramsci's political thought: an introduction. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Sklair, L. (1995). Sociology of the global system: Harvester Wheatsheaf London.

Sklair, L. (2009). The Transnational Capitalist Class and Contemporary Architecture in Globalizing Cities. Lotus International, 138, 4-18.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 817 time(s)
HTML: 2892 time(s) PDF: 415 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.