Child Criminal Justice System Diversion Policy And Child Psychological Health
Sulistya Eviningrum(1*)(1) Universitas PGRI Madiun
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Children are the next generation whose roles are crucial for the development and the livelihood of the nation and the state. The establishment of the juvenile criminal court system is in fact still inadequate. This is because most implementations carried out by law officials still bring negative impacts to the children’s mental condition. Most juvenile prisons result in a decrease in the children’s mental development in the future. This juridical-empirical research was legal research on the in-action implementation of normative laws in certain legal norms that happen in society. The analysis on the issues of the implementation of diversions in the renewal of the juvenile criminal court system in Indonesia and the ideal implementation of the diversion policy that are according to the law, and the implementation of the juvenile criminal court system in Indonesia are not yet optimum. Concluding a diversion that is ideal for implementation will result in the renewal of juvenile criminal law in the juvenile criminal court system, as it is synchronized juridically, sociologically, philosophically, theoretically, and comparatively. The implementation of the diversion harmonizes the juvenile criminal court system in Indonesia, namely the Law on Child Welfare, the Law on Human Rights, the Law on Child Protection, and the Convention on Children’s Rights.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
No Title. J Din HAM. 2001;2(1).
Suyanto B. Masalah Sosial Anak. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2003. 4 p.
Dellyana S. Wanita dan Anak di Mata Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty; 2004. 18–19 p.
Singh D. Child Rights and Sosial Wrongs An Analysis of Contemporery Realities, Volume 3 Child as Global Citizan: A Third World Perspective. New Delhi: Kaniskhka Publishers; 2001. 21–22 p.
Arief BN. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: CV Citra Aditya Bakti; 1998. 165 p.
Atmasasmita R. Peradilan Anak di Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju; 1997. 201 p.
Imran. Asas-Asas Dalam Berkontrak: Suatu Tinjauan Historis Yuridis Pada Hukum Perjanjian (Principles in Contracts: A Historical-Juridical Analysis on the Law of Contracts). Artikel Hukum Perdata.
Arief BN. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyususnan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2008. 26 p.
Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitiaan Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2012. 126 p.
Muhammad A. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2004. 134 p.
Ibrahim J. Teori dan Metodologi Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing; 2006. 323 p.
Handoyo BHC. Prinsip-Prinsip Legal Drafting dan Desain Naskah Akademik. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya; 2008. 64–69 p.
Waluyo B. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2002. 15 p.
Assiddiqie J. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Studi Bentuk-Bentuk Pidana Dalam Tradisi Hukum Fiqih Dan Relevansiya Bagi Usaha Pembaharuan KUHP Nasional. Bandung: Angkasa; 1996. 12–13 p.
Arief BN. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 1994. 18 p.
Muladi. Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Material Indonesia di Masa Mendatang. Semarang; 1990.
Wahyudi S. Implementasi Ide Diversi dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing; 2011. 141 p.
Nawan A. Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice. Anjar’s Blog. 2013.
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 272 time(s)PDF: 264 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.