Legal Politics of Pancasila Ideology against Radicalism in the State of Law Enforcement

Shinta Ayu Purnamawati(1*), Sidik Sunaryo(2),

(1) Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
(2) Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i2.14742

Abstract

Purpose of the study:

This study aims to analyze the legal politics of Pancasila as an ideology to eradicate radicalism in Indonesia.

Methodology:

The method employed in this study is a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches.

Results:

This study found that the fundamental problem in preventing radicalism within the framework of a rule of law is the inability to comprehend (ground) the basic values of ideology and the state constitution in a complete manner (kaffah) to manage and maintain the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The isolation and divides that negate the constitutional foundation and the ideal foundation in managing and maintaining the dignity of the nation's and state's sovereignty are another form of error in guiding the steps on the journey of the nation and the Indonesian State to the gate of bankruptcy as a sovereign nation and state.

 Applications of this study:

This research can be used by academics and practitioners in philosophical of law so that they can create an instrument to strengthen Pancasila as an ideology to combat radicalism.

 Novelty/Originality of this study:

Legislation may not immediately have an impact on changes and habits of people's behavior. Society does not abide by the law as autonomous individuals because principally, they are all social creatures. The social structure of a living society, called semi-autonomous social fields (SASF), gives rise to external regulations (national law) that are examined and interpreted. Therefore, the result of the encounter (clash) of internal rules with external rules in society is the formulation of strategic objectives of society that are constrasting with those originally intended by legislators.

Keywords

Pancasila, Radicalism, Legal Politic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Fatih, S., & Aditya, Z. F. (2019). THE LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST TERRORISM SUSPECTS IN INDONESIA (CASE STUDY OF THE ARREST PROCESS OF TERRORISM SUSPECTS BY DENSUS 88). Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8954

Aulia, F., & Al-Fatih, S. (2017). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Islamic Law dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Karakteristik Berpikir . Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(1), 98–113. Retrieved from http://202.52.52.22/index.php/legality/article/view/5993

Bedner, A. W., Irianto, S., Otto, J. M., & Wirastri, T. D. (Eds.). (2012). Socio-Legal Study. Series of Elements of Building a Rule of Law. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

HAM, K. (2016). Komnas HAM National Inquiry Summary April 2016.

Imparsial. (2021). Radikalisme dan Intoleransi Perlu Jadi Perhatian Kapolri. Retrieved from Kompas website: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/01/14/15385131/imparsial-intoleransi-radikalisme-dan-terorisme-perlu-jadi-perhatian-kapolri .

Indonesia, M. (n.d.). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Aksi Intoleran Masih Lemah. Retrieved from Media Indonesia website: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/104813/penegakan-hukum-terhadap-aksi-intoleran-masih-lemah

Institute, W. (n.d.). Survei Wahid Institute Toleransi dan Radikalisme Cenderung Naik. Retrieved from Media Indonesia website: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/284269/survei-wahid-institute-intoleransi-radikalisme-cend-naik

Irianto, S. (2009). Moving Law Review of Legal Anthropology. Jakarta: Obor Foundation.

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (A. Yunus, Ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Mu’ti, A., & Burhani, A. N. (2019). The limits of religious freedom in Indonesia: with reference to the first pillar Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa of Pancasila. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v9i1

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2017). Toward Responsive Law: Law & Society in Transition. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=3R0uDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=philippe+nonet&ots=gu3Yj8XQ5g&sig=5i6ObwgV6Km7q2fLhi8006P10P4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=philippe nonet&f=false

Nur, I., & Susanto. (2020). Social conflict in Indonesia: Safeguarding a nation as a new approach for resolving national disintegration. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(2), 151–173. Retrieved from https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/2315/451

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (Cetakan ke). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Marzuki,+Peter+Mahmud,+(2014),+Penelitian+Hukum,+Cetakan+ke-9,+Jakarta:+Kencana+Media+Group.&hl=id&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNlIjqlbTpAhXWWisKHWktCXAQ6AEIMjAB#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Sosiologi Hukum Perkembangan Metode dan Pilihan Masalah. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Sidharta. (2010). Penelitian dalam Perspektif Normatif. Semarang.

Suteki, S. (2008). REKONSTRUKSI POLITIK HUKUM TENTANG HAK MENGUASAI NEGARA ATAS SUMBER DAYA AIR BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN SOSIAL (Studi Privatisasi Pengelolaan Sum ber Daya Air). Universitas Diponegoro.

Suteki, & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filasafat, Teori dan Praktik). Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Tanya, B. L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., & Hage, M. Y. (2010). Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Yani, Y. M. (2012). Keharmonisan Kerjasama Kontra Terorisme Negara-Negara Anggota ASEAN dalam Kerangka ASEAN Security Community. Jurnal Sosial Politik, 1(2), 72–84. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jsp/article/download/4103/2452

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 488 time(s)
PDF: 526 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.