Electronic Trial At The Supreme Court: Needs, Challenges And Arrangement

Nurjihad Nurjihad, Ariyanto Ariyanto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i2.16348

Abstract

Purpose of thestudy: This study aims to find out about the current needs, challenges, and arragment for The Electronic Trial at The Supreme Courts. The implementation of e-court that has been running so far still causes problems, so it needs an in-depth study.

Methodology: In this research, the method used was normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach.

Results: The result of this study conclude that: first, the factual needs of the implementation of electronic trials in Indonesia cannot be separated from the social transformation that occurs in Indonesian society itself. Second, the general challenge in the implementation of electronic trials, which are trials and verdicts pronounced in court hearings that are open to the public or in public, is one part that is inseparable from the principle of fair trial. Third, the regulations related to the public trial should start from the preparation of PERMA that must obey the principle and with laws that are hierarchically higher than PERMA.

Applications of this study: This research is expected to identify the challenges posed in electronic courts, and provide policy recommendations on the regulation of electronic courts in Indonesia.

Novelty/ Orginalty of this study: Changes to the Law on Judicial Power must be formulated first in order to facilitate electronic court process services in the current digital era. Then, the existing PERMA needs to be adjusted to the principles of the principle of a trial open to the public in order to prevent conflicts with the laws and regulations on it.

Keywords

Eletronic Trial; Supreme Court; Fair Trial; Principle of the Openess to the Public

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bernadette Mulyati Waluyo, Asas Terbuka untuk Umum Dan Kehadiran Fisik Para Pihak Dalam Sidang di Pengadilan Negeri Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019, Journal Veritas et Justitia Vol. 6 No.1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v6i1.3883

Desak Paramita Brata, et al. Tinjauan Yuridis Asas Sidang Terbuka Untuk Umum Dalam Penyiaran Proses Persidangan Pidana. E-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Volume 3 No. 1 Tahun 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v3i1.28837

Fahmi Miqdad (6 Desember 2020). Penerapan Asas Pemeriksaan Persidangan Terbuka Untuk Umum Dalam E-Litigation. Kawan Hukum. https://kawanhukum.id/penerapan-asas-pemeriksaan-persidangan-terbuka-untuk-umum-dalam-e-litigation/

Geoffrey Robertson QC (1993). Freedom: The Individual and The Law. New York: Penguin Book.

H. Zainudin Ali (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Kamri Ahmad dan Hardianto Djanggih, Batasan Penerapan Asas Persidangan Terbuka Untuk Umum dalam Siaran Persidangan Pidana oleh Media, Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum Vol. 24 Issue 3 Juli 2017. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art8

Moch. Faisal Salam (2001). Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Mohammad Saleh (2016). Penerapan Asas Peradilan, Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan Pada Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Perdata. Yogyakarta: Graha Cendekia.

M. Yahya Harahap (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Rafli Fadilah Achmad (25 November 2019). Mengenal Lebih Jauh Bentuk Persidangan Bernama E-Litigation. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenal-lebih-jauh-bentuk-persidangan-bernama-e-litigation-lt5ddb56f5b594c

_______ (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Soerjono Soekanto (2016). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sofia Hasanah (3 Februari 2017). Arti Persidangan Terbuka untuk Umum. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-persidangan-terbuka-untuk-umum-lt5891989a80d7d

Sonyendah Retnaningsih, at al. Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan secara Elektronik (Study in the State Court in Indonesia), Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Vol. 50 No. 1 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2486

Sudikno Mertokusumo (2010). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.

Suharto dan Jonaedi Efendi (2013). Panduan Praktis Bila Anda Menghadapi Perkara Pidana. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945.

Law Number 1 of 1951 on Temporary Action-Tidnakan to Organize Unity of Power Arrangement and Civil Court Events.

Law Number 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure Law.

Law Number 12 of 2005 on Ratification.

Law Number 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Trials in Court Electronically.

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning the Power of Justice.

Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations.

Supreme Court Decree No. 129/KMA/SK/VIII/2019 Concerning Technical Instructions for the Administration of Trial Cases in the Court Electronically.

Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 1 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Duties During the Prevention of the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in the Environment of the Supreme Court and judicial Bodies under It.

Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 4 of 2019 on Civil Case Registration Obligations through E-Court.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 78 time(s)
PDF: 68 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.