Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Corruption

Vega pratama(1*),

(1) Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i1.12541

Abstract

This article intends to elaborate the model of corruption crimes resolved in a system of restorative justice that occurs in the State of Indonesia. This article emphasizes that efforts to eradicate corruption are not merely to provide punishment for those who are proven with the most severe punishment, but so that all countries that are caused by acts of corruption prevention can be returned in a short time. Technically, this study finds that there are 3 (three) conditions that cause the loss of the unlawful nature of a criminal act of corruption, namely: the suspect or defendant is disadvantaged; the state is not disadvantaged; community served. Based on the three conditions illustrate if the criminal act of corruption has returned the entire proceeds of the criminal act of corruption along with all the profits obtained from the results of the criminal act of corruption by the criminal act of corruption then basically the perpetrator is disadvantaged, the country does not suffer financial losses and the public can be served through returning all proceeds of corruption and all the benefits thereof. As a consequence, in order to create a restoring judicial process, this article desires to reduce the socio-economic burden of the state and law enforcement energy in handling cases of corruption.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alatas, S. H. (1987). The sociology of corruption: the nature, function, causes and prevention

of corruption.

Alkostar, A. (2011). Keadilan Restoratif. Kompas.Com.

Arief, B. N. (2002). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana (Revisi). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Atmasasmita, R. (1996). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Eksistensialisme dan

Abolisionisme. BinaCipta.

Dewi, D. (2011). Mediasi Penal: Penerapan Restorative Justice Di Pengadilan Anak

Indonesia. Indie Publishing.

ECOSOC. (2000). Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal

Matters. United Nations and the Rule of Law.

Effendy, M. (2014). Teori Hukum dari Perspektif Kebijakan, Perbandingan dan Harmonisasi

Hukum Pidana. Gaung Persada Press Group.

Fatah, A., Jaya, N. S. P., & Juliani, H. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Unsur Merugikan

Keuangan Negara Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(1), 1–15.

Flora, H. S. (2018). Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak

Pidana Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. University Of

Bengkulu Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.v3i2.6899

Gao, S. (2000). Economic & Social Affairs Economic Globalization : Trends , Risks and Risk

Prevention. United Nations.

Garner, B. (2009). Black Law Dictionary (9th ed.). West Publishing.

Haley, J. O. (2011). Introduction—Beyond Retribution: An Integrated Approach to

Restorative Justice. Washington Journal of Law and Policy, 36.

Humas Kemenko Polhukam RI. (2016). Pelatihan Bersama Penerapan Restorative Justice

dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Dihubungkan dengan Asset Recovery. Kementrian

Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum Dan Keamanan.

Kansil, C. S. T. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana: Hukum Pidana Untuk Tiap Orang.

Pradnya Paramita.

Makaro, M. T. (2013). Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam

Tindak Pidana yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak-Anak. BPHN Kementerian Hukum dan HAM.

Makawimbang, H. F., & Ilyas, H. (2014). Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana

Korupsi, Suatu Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Thafa Media.

Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative Justice : An Overview. Home Office Research Developement

and Statistic Directorat.

Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Kencana.

Minor, K. I., & Morrison, J. T. (1996). A Theoretical Study and Critique of Restorative

Justice. In Restorative Justice: International Perspectives.

Pangaribuan, L. M. (2009). Lay Judges & Hakim Ad Hoc: Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai

Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Purwoleksono, D. E. (2019). Hukum Pidana Untaian Pemikiran. Airlangga University Press.

Putri, N. S., & Tajudin, I. (2015). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas Melalui

Pendekatan Restorative Justice Sebagai Dasar Penghentian Penyidikan dan Perwujudan

Asas Keadilan dalam Penjatuhan Putusan. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal

of Law). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n1.a9

Rusianto, A. (2015). Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui

Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Kencana.

Sahbani, A. (2017). Begini Alasan MK Ubah Delik Tipikor. Hukumonline.Comom.

Zumhana, F. (2016). Restorative Justice Sebagai Primum Remidium dalam Upaya

Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Universitas Airlangga.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 393 time(s)
PDF: 494 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.