ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN GURU SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK KURIKULUM 2013 DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Anna Mariyani(1*)

(1) STKIP Muhammadiyah Blora
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The thematic approach must be implemented at all levels of education in the learning process for elementary school, junior high school and senior high school. This is something that is important for teachers, one of which is elementary school teachers to be able to carry out a thematic approach as a professional responsibility. In addition to implementing a thematic approach, elementary school teachers must also always innovate in implementing the education process. This study was conducted with the following objectives: 1) analyzing elementary school teachers 'understanding of the thematic approach, 2) obtaining a profile of elementary school teachers' ability to innovate in the learning process with a thematic approach, and 3) knowing the obstacles of teachers in implementing thematic approaches in elementary school. The study used a qualitative descriptive method with research subjects from grade 1 to grade 6 students in five elementary schools in Blora District, Blora Regency, collected by observation and interview. Triangulation is done through focus group discussions between researchers, teachers, and school principals. The results showed that conceptually the teacher understood the thematic approach well, but in its implementation 24 of the 30 teachers studied did not innovate in the learning process

Keywords

Learning innovation, teacher ability, Primary School teacher, thematic approach

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akbar, S. (2010). Pengembangan Model- model Pembelajaran Tematis untuk kelas 1 dan 2 SD: Identifikasi dan Perancangan Model Konseptual Pembelajaran Tematis untuk kelas 1 dan 2 SD. Laporan Penelitian, Malang: Lemlit UM.

Anitah W.S. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Bogdan, B.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1982) Qualitative Research for Education, an Introduction to Theory and Methode. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Creswell, J.W. (2010). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach (Third Edition). Penerjemah Achmad Farwaid. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Joni, T. R. (1996). Pembelajaran Terpadu. Naskah Program Pelatihan Guru Pamong, BP3GSD PPTG Ditjen Dikti.

Lincoln, Y.S. dan Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistik Inquiry. London: Sage Publication.

Moleong, L.J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, S. (1988). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik-Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Trasito.

Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryosubroto. (2009). Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Trianto. (2009). Mengembangkan Model Pembelajaran Tematik. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakaraya.

Trianto. (2011). Desain Pengembangan Pembelajaran Tematik bagi Anak Usia Dini TK/ RA dan Anak Usia Kelas Awal SD/ MI. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Uno, H.B. (2009). Profesi Kependidikan: Problema, Solusi, dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1611 time(s)
PDF: 1405 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.