Improving De-Escalation Strategy: Monitoring Control, Bonus Incentive and Escalation of Commitment

Frisky Jeremy Kasingku(1*)

(1) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Klabat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Managers continue to perform irrational behavior by escalating the wrong decision hoping that the situation will change. The irrational escalation of commitment bring negative influences on organization performance. Previous studies have found several mitigation strategies. One of the strategies found is called monitoring control in private information situations. However, this strategy has not considered the agency problem that can occur between owners and managers. For this reason, this study seeks to improve the de-escalation monitoring strategy by adding agency theory. The Experimental method with factorial design of 2x2x2 is applied to answer research problem. The first factor is information (public vs private), the second factor is monitoring control (present vs absent) and the third factor is bonus incentive (present vs absent). The participants in this study were 159 undergraduate students who were taking principles of investment course. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was conducted.  As a result, there are interaction effects from the variables of monitoring control, information availability, and bonus incentive. The interaction effect distinguishes participants in making decisions. Companies can consider giving monitoring control and bonuses together to differentiate managers' decisions when assessing projects. Further study may explore more detail on the bonus procedures with more in-depth bonus mechanism.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baiman, S. (1990). Agency research in managerial accounting: A second look. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 341-371

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and Kanodia, C. (2009). The role of Information Asymmetry in Escalation Phenomena: Empirical Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organizaiton, 69(2) 135-147

Booth, P. and Schulz, A. (2004). The impact of an ethical environment on managers’ project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions. Accounting, Organizationsand Society, 29(5-6), 473-488

Cheng, M. M., Shulz, A. K. D., Luckett, P. F. and Booth, P. (2003). The effects of hurdle rates on the level of escalation of commitment in capital budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 63-85

Chong, V. K., and Suryawati, R. F. (2010). De-escalation strategy: The impact of monitoring control on managers’ project evaluation decisions. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8(2), 39-50

Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford: Standford University Press.

George, J., & Dane, E. (2018). Affect, Emotion, and Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 136, 47-55

Gitman, L., and Chad, Z. (2012). Principles of Managerial Finance, 13th Ed. USA: Pearson Education

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360

Kadous, K. and Sedor, L. M. (2004). The efficacy of third-party consultation in preventing managerial escalation of commitment: The role of mental representations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(1), 55-82

Keil, M. (1995). Escalation of Commitment in Information Systems Development: A Comparison of Three Theories. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), 348-352

Ku, G. (2008). Learning to de-escalate: The effects of regret in escalation of commitment. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 105(2), 221-232

Lee, J. S., Keil, M. and Wong K. F. E. (2014). The effect of goal difficulty on escalation of commitment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(2), 114-129

Li, H. and Wang, Z. (2015). Power or powerless when change is needed: Effects of power on escalation of commitment. Social, Behavior, and Personality, 43(1), 123-136

Nahartyo. E. and Utami, I. (2016). Panduan Praktis Riset Eksperimen. Jakarta: Indeks

Nahartyo, E. (2013). Desain dan Implementasi Riset Eksperimen. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN

Sarangee, K., Schmidt, J., and Calantone, R. (2018). Anticipated Regret and escalation of commitment to failing, new product development projects in business markets. Industrial Marketing Management: In Press.

Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., and Miles, J. E. (2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 541-562

Steinkuhler, D., Mahlendorf, M. D., and Brettel, M. (2014). How self-justification indirectly drives escalation of commitment – A motivational perspective. Schmalenbach Business Review, 15(2), 191-222

Staw, B. M. (1976), Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27-44.

DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v5i1.10377

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 680 time(s)
PDF: 692 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.