ANALISIS PREFERENSI VISUAL LANSKAP PLANTING SCREEN DI GEDUNG PERPUSTAKAAN
Rizka Nabilah(1*)(1) Institut Teknologi Sumatera
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Preferensi visual digunakan untuk menentukan alternatif desain fisik. Hal tersbut berfungsi saat perencanaan dan desain bangunan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dengan Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE) pada empat montase gambar yang dibuat. Penilaian SBE dilakukan pada 30 mahasiswa arsitektur lanskap. Hasil menunjukkan desain planting screen yang menjadi preferensi responden adalah montase foto kombinasi vegetasi hijau dan berbunga dengan nilai 0,983.
Keywords
References
Bishop, I. D., & Hulse, D. W. (1994). Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30(1–2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90067-1
Cook, P. S., & Cable, T. T. (1995). The scenic beauty of shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)00171-X
Daniel T, Boster R. (1976). Measuring Landscape Aesthetic: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Colorado (US): USDA Forest Service.
Daniel Franco, Davide Franco, Ilda Mannino, & Gabriele Zanetto. (2003). The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3), 119–138.
de Almeida Rodrigues, A., da Cunha Bustamante, M. M., & Sano, E. E. (2018). As far as the eye can see: Scenic view of Cerrado National Parks. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.11.004.
d’Acampora, B. H. A., Higueras, E., & Román, E. (2018). Combining different metrics to measure the ecological connectivity of two mangrove landscapes in the Municipality of Florianópolis, Southern Brazil. Ecological Modelling, 384(June), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.06.005
Daniel Franco, Davide Franco, Ilda Mannino, & Gabriele Zanetto. (2003). The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3), 119–138.
Frank, S., Fürst, C., Koschke, L., Witt, A., & Makeschin, F. (2013). Assessment of landscape aesthetics - Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators, 32, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026
Gandy, R., & Meitner, M. J. (2007). The effects of an advanced traveler information system on scenic beauty ratings and the enjoyment of a recreational drive. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1–2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.018
Indri S. (2010). Evaluasi Perseptual Kualitas Estetika dan Ekologi Objek Wisata Kebun Raya Cibodas. [skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Kuper, R. (2020). Preference and restorative potential for landscape models that depict diverse arrangements of defoliated, foliated, and evergreen plants. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 48, 126570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126570
Nasar, JL. (1992). Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Application. New York (US): Cambridge University Press.
Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum
The measurement of meaning. Urbana:
The Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana
Tveit, M. S. (2009). Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2882–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 283 time(s)Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
