Analisis Preferensi Visual Lanskap Planting Screen sebagai Elemen dengan Fungsi Estetika di Gedung Perpustakaan

Rizka Nabilah(1*)

(1) Institut Teknologi Sumatera
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Preferensi visual digunakan untuk menentukan alternatif desain fisik dari penilaian pengguna atau manusia sebagai objek. Hal tersbut berfungsi saat perencanaan dan desain bangunan, untuk menentukan desain yang sesuai. Kasus perencanaan dan desain hanya dinilai dari persepsi dan preferensi desainer tanpa melihat kebutuhan pengguna dan preferansi pengguna. Dengan demikian, perlu adanya tahapan dalam menganalisis preferensi pengguna pada tampilan fisik bangunan. Metode penelitian yang berkaitan dengan penilaian visual dalam analisis lanskap adalah menggunakan Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE). Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah pemilihan empat montase gambar yang dibuat. Penilaian SBE dilakukan pada 30 mahasiswa arsitektur lanskap. Hasil menunjukkan desain planting screen yang menjadi preferensi responden adalah montase foto kombinasi vegetasi hijau dan berbunga dengan nilai 0,983.

Keywords

bangunan; planting screen; Institut Pertanian Bogor; Scenic Beauty Estimation; visual lanskap.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bishop, I. D., & Hulse, D. W. (1994). Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 30(1–2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90067-1

Cook, P. S., & Cable, T. T. (1995). The scenic beauty of shelterbelts on the Great Plains. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)00171-X

Daniel T, Boster R. (1976). Measuring Landscape Aesthetic: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Colorado (US): USDA Forest Service.

Daniel Franco, Davide Franco, Ilda Mannino, & Gabriele Zanetto. (2003). The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3), 119–138. de Almeida Rodrigues, A., da Cunha Bustamante, M. M., & Sano, E. E. (2018). As far as the eye can see: Scenic view of Cerrado National Parks. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.11.004.

d’Acampora, B. H. A., Higueras, E., & Román, E. (2018). Combining different metrics to measure the ecological connectivity of two mangrove landscapes in the Municipality of Florianópolis, Southern Brazil. Ecological Modelling, 384(June), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.06.005

Daniel Franco, Davide Franco, Ilda Mannino, & Gabriele Zanetto. (2003). The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation the role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3), 119–138.

Frank, S., Fürst, C., Koschke, L., Witt, A., & Makeschin, F. (2013). Assessment of landscape aesthetics - Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators, 32, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026

Gandy, R., & Meitner, M. J. (2007). The effects of an advanced traveler information system on scenic beauty ratings and the enjoyment of a recreational drive. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1–2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.018

Indri S. (2010). Evaluasi Perseptual Kualitas Estetika dan Ekologi Objek Wisata Kebun Raya Cibodas. [skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Kuper, R. (2020). Preference and restorative potential for landscape models that depict diverse arrangements of defoliated, foliated, and evergreen plants. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 48, 126570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126570

Nasar, JL. (1992). Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Application. New York (US): Cambridge University Press.

Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum, 1957. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: The Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana

Tveit, M. S. (2009). Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2882–2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021

DOI: 10.23917/sinektika.v18i1.13310

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 828 time(s)
PDF: 560 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.