KAJIAN PSIKOLOGI BELAJAR: MENGUKIR PRESTASI MELALUI PENGENALAN DIRI DAN OPTIMALISASI POTENSI

Eny Purwandari(1*)

(1) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Self knowledge is a process which must be conceded by every
individual. In this process, it is likely that an individual knows his strength
and weakness. The strength does not always cause benefit, on the other
hand the weakness does not always cause a misplace. However, if both
of them are managed well, it will cause something extraordinary. The
student has to know his self knowledge to get the best achievement.  Some
of the things that should be considered are: style of learning, emotion
and the ways of life orientation. For the students of MAN I Sragen, the
learning style tends to be auditory. They manage their emotion well enough,
and their ways of life are focused on three things namely: spirit, family
harmony, and achievement. Based on the result of social service, the
students and the teachers have to use and maximize it well so that their
positive potential can be optimized and developed well either individually
or collectively in the educational institution.

Keywords

pengenalan diri; gaya belajar; emosi; nilai-nilai hidup

Full Text:

PDF

References

Antariksa. 2002. Studi Emosi. http. www. Geocities.com. 10 Januari 2002.

Berry, J.W, Poortinga, Y, Segall, M, dan Dasen, P.R. 1999. Psikologi Lintas

Budaya: Riset dan Aplikasi. Alih Bahasa : Edi Suhardono. Jakarta:

PT. Gramedia.

De Porter, B., & Hernachi, M. 2000 Quantum Learning. Bandung: PT.

Kaifa.

Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. 1998. The Sheme of Learning Style. Retieved Juli,

, 2002, from http://www.learning style.ned/n3.htlm.

Elliot, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., Littlefield, J., Travers, J . F. 1997. Educational

Psychologi Effective Teachine, Effective Learning. Singapore:

McGraw-Hill.

Fleming, N.D. 2002. VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles. Retrieved Juli 4,

, from

http://www.vark-learn.com.

Goleman, Daniel. 1996. Emotional Intelligence. Jakarta: PT. SUN.

Gregory, R. 2000. Psychological Testing, History, Principles, and

Application. USA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

Jopson, A. dan Zhao, T. t.t. Effect Personal Values on Auditors Ethical

Decisions. www.yahoo.com.rokeach values survey application.

Hartanti dan Arhartanto. 20003. Profil Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Baru: Survei

Berdasarkan Metode Barbe dan Swassing. Anima, Indonesian

Psychological Journal. Vol. 18, No. 3, 295 – 307.

Hawari, D. 1997. Al Qur’an Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa dan Kesehatan Jiwa.

Jakarta: Dana Bhakti Prima Yasa.

Hurlock, E.B. 1996. Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Kniker, C. R. 1977. You And Values Education. USA: Charles E. Merrill

Publishing Company.

Lazarus, R.S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Ovadia, S. 2004. “Rating and Rangkings: Reconsidering The Structure of

Values and Their Measurement”. International Journal of Social

Research Methodology, Vol. 7, No. 5, 403-414.

Renzetti dan Curran. 1998. Values, Sosial Problem and Religiosity - A

Survey.

www.yahoo.com.rokeach values survey application.

Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free

Press.

Tilman, D. 2004. Living Values Activities for Young Adults. Pendidikan

Nilai untuk Kaum Dewasa –Muda. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Tjundjing, A dan Lasmono. 2003. “Profil Preferensi VARK pada Mahasiswa

Baru”.. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal Vol. 18, No.3,

– 294.

DOI: 10.23917/warta.v10i1.3213

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1065 time(s)
PDF: 1034 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.