APAKAH MEREKA BEKERJA? STUDI REALITAS OBJEKTIF AKTIVITAS MENGEMIS DI TULUNGAGUNG

Prasetyo Adi Nugroho(1*), Nindya Nurdianasari(2), Hari Satrijono(3)

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
(2) Universitas Jember
(3) Universitas Jember
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to analyze people's perceptions regarding the act of begging as a work activity, so that the status of the existence of begging activities can be obtained. This study uses a qualitative research design. The research was conducted in Tulungagung from January 2020 to January 2021. The research subjects were 10 people who had experience interacting with beggars. Collecting data using thematic interviews as an approach. The results of the study showed that the respondents dominantly made the perception that the activity of begging was a work activity. This is indicated by the informant's findings that 1) beggars seek a certain income; 2) begging is considered the easiest alternative to earn money; 3) beggars are considered lazy to work in the formal realm. The perception of begging as a work activity is driven by the perception that beggars apply an attempt to lie by displaying a symbol of poverty to obtain maximum income. So that begging is placed in a fair status with consideration, beggars are individuals who are lazy to work and beggars are parents and people with physical disabilities. Taking into account the existence of prevailing norms, the informants placed the activity of begging as a work activity in a pathological position and had implications for the rejection of the existence of begging activities. Rejection is represented by a response negligence acts as a cultural treatment and arrests, coaching, and repatriation of perpetrators are carried out as institutional treatment.

Keywords

Beggar, negligent, institutional treatment

References

Ahmad, M. 2010. Strategi Kelangsungan Hidup Gelandangan-Pengemis (Gepeng). Jurnal Penelitian, Nopember 2010, 7(9), 1–16.

As’ari, H., & Mudzakkir, M. 2015. Pengemis Dan Makam (Fenomena Pengemis di Makam Sunan Giri Kabupaten Gresik) Hasim. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Azis, A., Maftuhin, M., & Nugraha, D. M. 2021. Citizenship education in the Covid-19 era: How to become a digital citizen? Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18 (2), 207–216. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/40833.

Bahfiarti, T., Muhammad, R., & Aminuddin. 2019. Kajian Penanganan Anak Gelandangan Dan Pengemis Di Kota Makassar (Study on Handling of Children and Beggars in Makassar City). Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pelayanan Publik Makassar,1(2), Juli-Desember, 43–54.

Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. 2013. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan: Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan. (terjemahan) . Jakarta: LP3E.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Penyandang Masalah Kesejahteraan Sosial Menurut Kabupaten/Kota, 2016. (Online) diakses pada April 2022. https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2017/10/10/650/penyandang-masalahkesejahteraan-sosial-menurut-kabupaten-kota-2016.html.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Penyandang Masalah Kesejahteraan Sosial Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Jawa Timur, 2017. (Online) diakses pada April 2022. https://jatim.bps.go.id/statictable/2019/10/16/2044/penyandangmasalah-kesejahteraan-sosial-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-jawatimur-2017.html.

Chimdessa, A. F. 2020. Initiation into street, challenges, means of survival and perceived strategies to alleviate its plights among street children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2019. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.22484/v1.

Damayanti, F. 2016. Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Pengemis Dalam Perspektif Teori Dramaturgi (Studi Kasus Di Desa Pageralang, Kecamatan Kemranjen, Kabupaten Banyumas).

Desriyanti. 2007. Miskin Papa: Kajian Antropologis Terhadap Kelompok Pengemis di Kota Medan. (Tidak diterbitkan) Universitas Negeri Medan.

Fuseini, T., & Daniel, M. 2020. Child begging, as a manifestation of child labour in Dagbon of Northern Ghana, the perspectives of mallams and parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 111 (February), 104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104836.

Grundmann, R. 2017. The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies. Minerva, 55(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9308-7.

Hanifa, N. 2019. Penyelesaian Konflik Keluarga pada Komunitas Pengemis: Studi di Kota Malang. Journal of Family Studies, 3(2), 1–14. http://urj.uinmalang.ac.id/index.php/jfs/article/download/277/203.

Hansson, E., & Jansson, D. 2019. Who’s afraid of the ‘beggar’? A psychoanalytic interpretation of the crises triggered by the begging of ‘EU migrants’ in Sweden. Social and Cultural Geography, 22(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1585563.

Iqbali, S. 2008. Studi Kasus Gelandangan-Pengemis (Gepeng) Di Kecamatan Kubu Kabupaten Karangasem. Arsyad, Azhar, 25, 2002.

Kaelan, M.S. 2002. Filsafat Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Fakulti Filsafat UGM.

Kasim, N., Musa, F. T., & Latare, Z. 2015. Kehidupan Pengemis (Studi Kasus Kehidupan Pengemis Kabupaten Gorontalo). KIM Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, 3(2).

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. 2005. Qualitative Data Analysis (terjemahan). Jakarta: UI Press .

Peraturan Daerah Kota Malang No. 9 Tahun 2013 tentang penanggulangan gelandangan dan pengemis. Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial.

Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Tulungagung Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kabupaten Tulungagung Tahun 2018-2023.

Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Jember No 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Penyelenggaraan Kesejahteraan Sosial.

Prihatini, N. (2013). Pengemis di kawasan ziarah makam Sunan Gunung Jati Cirebon.

Rahmalia & Zulyadi, T. 2019. Performance in Public: Interpersonal Communication of Beggar. Jurnal Ilmiah ISLAM FUTURA, 19(1), 49–67.

Ritzer, G. & Goodman D.J. 2011. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sari, D. Y., & Bakar, A. A. 2020. Efektifitas Penanggulangan Gelandangan Dan Pengemis Di Kabupaten Tulungagung (Studi di Kantor Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja Kabupaten Tulungagung). Jurnal Mediasosian : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 4 (1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.30737/mediasosian.v4i1.821.

Setyaningrum, N. 2014. Fenomena Pengemis Anak di Pasar Klewer Surakarta (Studi tentang Fenomena Akses Layanan Pengemis Anak). SOSIALITAS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi, 5(1). https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sosant/article/view/4322/3024.

Sridiyatmika, G. 2018. Keberadaan Komunitas Pengemis di Kota Yogyakarta dalam Kajian IPS Mengenai Budaya Kemiskinan Akibat Proses Reproduksi Sosial. Jurnal Sosialita. 10(c), 33–52.

Ulum, M., Mun’im, A., & Sholihuddin, S. 2019. Pendampingan Komunitas Pengemis dalam Melestarikan Piwulang Kanjeng Sunan Drajat Lamongan. Dimas: Jurnal Pemikiran Agama Untuk Pemberdayaan, 18(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.21580/dms.2018.182.2989.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 1950 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten di Djawa Timur.

Yuniarti, L. 2013. Perilaku Pengemis Di Alum-Alun Kota Probolinggo. Perilaku Pengemis Di Alun-Alun Kota Probolinggo, 37, 1–7.

Yuniarti, N. 2013. Eksploitasi Anak Jalanan Sebagai Pengamen Dan Pengemis Di Terminal Tidar Oleh Keluarga. KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 4(2), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v4i2.2416.

DOI: 10.23917/jpis.v32i1.18096

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 544 time(s)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia): 730 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.