The effectiveness of goal-free problems for studying triangle similarity in collaborative groups

Pratama Wahyu Purnama(1*), Endah Retnowati(2)

(1) Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University,
(2) Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University,
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Similarity is a topic in Geometry which investigates similar elements of a plane. This topic has a high complexity that generates cognitive load in working memory. A deep understanding of the concept is needed to solve similarity problems. Based on cognitive load theory, learning by goal-free problems is suggested since it can minimize cognitive load. This research examined the effectiveness of presenting similarity inquiries using goal-free problems for learning by collaboration. Using a factorial design: 2 presentation techniques (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) x 2 groupings (collaborative vs. individual) in authentic classrooms, the experiment consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, learning phase, retention test, and transfer test. One-hundred eleven eighth-graders from four classrooms in a junior high school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, served as research participants. The findings showed that students who were learning using goal-free problems possessed significantly higher scores of retention and transfer tests, as well as experience lower cognitive load during both tests. On the contrary, it was found that studying individually yielded a significantly higher transfer score than studying collaboratively. Since there was no interaction effect, it may be concluded that goal-free problems can be effective for either collaborative or individual learning.

Keywords

Geometry, goal-free problems, cognitive load, collaborative learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ayres, P. L. (1993). Why Goal-Free Problems Can Facilitate Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1027

BSNP. (2006). Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta:

BSNP

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publication.

Hill, S., & Hill, T. (1993). The Collaborative class room. A guide to co-operative learning. Amadale, Vic: Eleanor Curtin Publishing

Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does Tracing Worked Examples Enhance Geometry Learning?.Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 14, 45-49.

Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002

Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Efektivitas worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/JRPM.V6I1.21452

Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. R. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Malmberg, J., Haataja, E., Seppänen, T., &Järvelä, S. (2019). Are we together or not? The temporal interplay of monitoring, physiological arousal and physiological synchrony during a collaborative exam. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09311-4

Maulidya, S. R., Hasanah, R. U., &Retnowati, E. (2017). Can goal-free problems facilitating students’ flexible thinking? AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995128

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

Mønster, D., Håkonsson, D. D., Eskildsen, J. K., &Wallot, S. (2016). Physiological evidence of interpersonal dynamics in a cooperative production task. Physiology and Behavior, 156, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.004

Nurjanah, A., &Retnowati, E. (2018). Analyzing the extraneous cognitive load of a 7 th grader mathematics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012131

Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R. (2001). Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.181

Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8

Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-Term Retention of Individual Verbal Items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049234

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., &Sweller, J. (2010). Worked example effects in individual and group work settings. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443411003659960

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., &Sweller, J. (2017). Can collaborative learning improve the effectiveness of worked examples in learning mathematics? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000167

Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., &Sweller, J. (2018). Collaborative learning effects when students have complete or incomplete knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(6), 681–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3444

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201

Soller, A. (2001). Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40–62.

Sugiman, S., Retnowati, E., Ayres, P., & Murdanu, M. (2019). Learning Goal-Free Problems: Collaboratively or Individually? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.26914

Sweller, J. (2010, June 23). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 22, pp. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory: Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies Series Editors. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/series/8640

Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (2016). Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn. Cognition and Instruction, (September 1994). https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203

Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means-ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.463

Tasari, J. D. (2011). Matematika Jilid 3 untuk SMP dan MTs Kelas IX. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan Pendidikan Nasional.

Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Dykema-Engblade, A., & Kluwe, K. (2012). Good and bad group performance: Same process—different outcomes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212454928

Trochim, W. M. (2006, October 20). Covariance design. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/expcov.php

Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366. https://doi.org/10.2307/749186

Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P., Schubert, C., &Sweller, J. (2014). Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000021

DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11198

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 902 time(s)
PDF: 767 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.