Pancasila and Economy Prophetic: the Reconstruction Efforts of Indonesian Economic Law

Nurjannah Septyanun(1*), Tin Yuliani(2),

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v2i1.11104

Abstract

Purphose: The importance of the transcendental paradigm, able to change the demoralization of the economic sphere, affects the changing economic goals of Pancasila.  

 Methodology: Using normative legal research, with paradigmatic approaches and using qualitative descriptive analysis.

 Finding: The symbolic phenomenon of religious rituals is not merely ritualism in the concept of civil religion. But able to penetrate the particulate partition of the operational dimension.  Similarly, the prophetic paradigm, with its prophetic ethics in terms of liberation, humanization, Transcendence, gives space to the fundamental beliefs of society in economics. Civil religion minimizes the ongoing dominance, hegemonic, and exploitative of anti-humanity. The prophetic paradigm and civil religion are capable of being great energy for the realization of the idealism of Pancasila, the first of the transcendental meaning.

 Importance: The transcendental dimension, of the first Sila, being a turning point. The importance of awareness of the community, and the legal traveler for the reconstruction of Indonesian economic law to realize the social justice of Pancasilais.

 Originality/Novelty: The Prophetic and civil religion paradigms, becoming one of the bids on economic demoralization.

 

Keyword: Civil Religion; Profetic ethics; Pancasila; Indonesian economic law.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Absori, at.All, (2015). Hukum Profetik Kritik terhadap Paradigma Hukum Non Sistematik, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing,

Absori, et.all, (2016). Cita Hukum Pancasila, Ragam Paradigma Berkepribadian Indonesia, Nurjannah Septyanun, “Ekonomi Kerakyatan untuk mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial yang Pancasilais”, Surakarta: Pustaka Iltizam.

Musa Asy’arie, (2016). Ontology Ilmu, Materi Kuliah Filsafat Ilmu, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Eko Priyono, (2008). dalam Jeffrie Geovanie, Civil Religion Dimensi Sisial Politik Islam. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2013.

Haris Rusli Petisi 28, (2016). “Operasi Mindset” Telah Berhasil “Membunuh” dan Mengendalikan Arah Fikiran dan Perasaan Bangsa Kita, Seri 8, Note 23 Maret 2016, di akses pada tanggal 14 September.

Haris Rusli Petisi 28, (2016). Ancaman “Predator Dasamuka” Di Era Pasar Bebas Asean, Seri 5, Note 03 Januari 2016, Diakses pada 7 September.

Kelik Wardiono, (2016). Paradigma Profetik Pembaruan Basis Epistimologi Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta. Genta Publishing.

Tomy Michael, (2015). Eksistensi Ilmu Hukum Profetik di Masa Mendatang. Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Makalah seminar, disampaikan pada konferensi ke-5 AFHI di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 17-18 November.

Hasnan Bachtiar, (2012). Profetisme, Muhammadiyah dan Gelombang Besar Globalisasi: Suatu Tinjauan Transformasi Social. The Center Religious and Social Studies, Malang. Volume 15 Nomor 1 Juni.

Anwar Abbas, (2010). Bung Hatta dan Ekonomi Islam. Ed. Mukkaer Pakkana. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

Noffellisa, (2016), Sistem Ekonomi Bung Hatta Sejalan dengan Konsep Islam, Era Muslim Media Islam Rujukan, di posting pada Kamis 14 Agustus 2008, didownload pada, Kamis 28 Oktober.

Nurjannah S, et,all, (2020). Hukum dan Perbankan Syariah: Dinamika, Konstruksi Paradigma Pembaharuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Oetojo Usman dan Alfian (peny), (1992). Pancasila sebagai Ideology dalam Berbagai Bidang Kehidupan Masyarakat, Berbangsa dan Bernegara, Jakarta: BP-7 Pusat.

Otje Salman dan Anton F. Susanto, (2007). Teori Hukum Mengingat, Mengumpulkan dan Membuka Kembali, Ed. Aep Gunarsa, Bandu

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 429 time(s)
PDF: 510 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.