Muhammadiyah Perspective Constitutional Jihad Paradigm (Case Study of Muhammadiyah’s Request Against Law Number 7 of 2004 Concerning Water Resources)

Ahmad Zia Khakim(1*),

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v4i1.18699

Abstract

The Constitutional Court (MK) granted the petition for judicial review of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources (UU SDA) which was submitted by the Central Executive (PP) of Muhammadiyah. Testing the application for the Natural Resources Law is a strategy to fight for the weak (mustad’afin) according to the basic principles of Islam. Thus, this test argument is also based on the benefits of ecology and nature contained in Islamic law. The review of the Natural Resources Law can also be seen as an effort to examine the similarities between the principles of Islamic law and the 1945 Constitution. The research method uses a socio-legal judicial review approach, by reviewing the decision in the application for Law No. 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources. against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia with Decision Number 85/PUU-XI/2013. This research is normative based on primary data, namely decision 85/PUU-XI/2013 with bibliographical data and uses a statute approach. This conclusion makes it very clear that Muhammadiyah has taken a Judicial Review step against the Natural Resources Law which is contrary to the 1945 Constitution. This shows that Muhammadiyah has built a constitutional jihad as a concrete ijtihad in an effort to straighten environmental law enforcement which the state should do in accordance with Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution.

Keywords: Muhammadiyah, Judicial Review, Natural Resources Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arifin, S. (2021). The Theory and Practice of Legislation Illiberal tendencies in Indonesian legislation : the case of the omnibus law on job creation Illiberal tendencies in Indonesian legislation : the case. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 0(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2021.1942374

Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Omnibus Law dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.

Fuady, M. (2009). Teori Negara Hukum Modern. Refika Aditama.

Hardjasoemantri, K. (2002). Hukum Tata Lingkungan. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Kudzaifah Dimyati, dkk. (2020). Genealogi Negara: Hegemoni Koorporatokrasi Negara Hukum Kesejahteraan Indonesia. Genta Publishing.

Noyes, J. E. (2012). The Common Heritage of mandkind: Past, Present, and Future. Denver Jounal of Intenational Law and Policy, 40.

Putusan Nomor 85/PUU-XI/2013 Uji Mareriil Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 tentang Sumber Daya Air. (2013). 6.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 002/PUU-I/2003 dan www.hukumonline.com 24/02/15: 1).

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-V/2007: 1)

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012: 15-16)

Setiawan, Benni. (2015). Jihad Konstitusi Muhammadiyah.

Soediro. (2017). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85 / Puu-Xi / 2013 Tentang Pembatalan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sumber Daya Alam. Prosiding: Sinergitas Mahkamah Agung Dan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Mewujudkan Excellent Court, 53–60.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.

Wartini, S. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Internasional: Peran Konsumen Hijau dan Ekolabel. UII Press.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 219 time(s)
PDF: 194 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.