Policy Review On Returning Protected Area East Coast Of Surabaya

Betty Herdinawati(1*),

(1) Universitas Airlangga
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v5i2.8000

Abstract

This study aims to identify steps to restore the function of the protected area of East Coast of Surabaya (Pamurbaya) by the government, to analyze the impact on the fulfillment of the rights of the people residing at Wisma Tirto Agung Phase IV, and to analyze the impact caused by evictions. This study used a qualitative analysis method with sociolegal research type, as well as an empirical juridical approach. The data used are primary data sourced from interviewers and other secondary data. This research was conducted on the basis of a violation of the sale and purchase of land plots which continued with the construction of residents' houses in the protected area of East Coast Surabaya (Pamurbaya), namely in Gunung Anyar District, Rungkut District, Sukolilo District and Mulyorejo District. The results of this study indicate that the Surabaya Municipal Government has not provided a clear solution to the cases that occurred so that the residents of Wisma Tirto Agung stage IV continue to live in their respective homes. The plan to return the function of the protected area by means of eviction is still in the assessment stage because the Surabaya City Government cannot decide to evict without paying attention to the rights of the community to have a proper place to live. In carrying out evictions, of course there are impacts that arise from psychological, economic, and social aspects.

 

Keywords: Protected Area, Right to House, Eviction

Keywords

Protected Area, Right to House, Eviction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aminah, S. (2015). Conflict and Contestation of Surabaya City Spatial Planning. MASYARAKAT: Journal of Sociology, 59-79.

Burov, V., Patarakin, E., & Yarmakhov, B. (2012, October). A crowdsourcing model for public consultations on draft laws. In ICEGOV (pp. 450-451).

Cotterrell, R. (2017). Law, culture and society: Legal ideas in the mirror of social theory. Routledge.

Fathani, S. M. (2012). Eviction as Implications of Green Open Space Policy from a Human Rights Perspective: Clean Park Eviction Case Study, Humane and Dignified (Bmw). Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 7(2).

Ichsan, A. C. (2018). Performance of the Development of Wain River Protected Forest Management Unit and Manggar Watershed in East Kalimantan Province. Jurnal Belantara, 1(1).

Junia, B. R. (2016). Jakarta Development Resistance Conflict: The Dynamics of Development Synergy between Government and Community Interests. Gema Keadilan, 3(1).

Kartono, J. L. (2004). Human Space and Home An Overview of Cultural Perspectives. Dimensi (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 27(2).

MD, Moh. Mahfud. (2010). The Constitution and Law in Controversial Issues. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.

Priyarsono, D. S. (2017). Building from the Edge: An Overview of the Perspective of Regional Economics. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 1(1), 42-52.

Rahman, F., & Hasanah, U. (2017). Status of Customary Rights of Customary Law Communities Included in Protected Forest Areas (Case in Balung Village, XIII Koto Kampar District, Kampar Regency). Student Online Journal (JOM) in the Field of Law, 4(1), 1-15.

Rogers, A. P. V. (2003). Humanitarian intervention and international law. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 27, 725.

Setiawan, R. P. (2010). Evictions of Illegal Settlements in the Kali Jagir Stren: An Overview of Law and Humanism. In the National Seminar on Residential Housing in City Development (Vol. 1, pp. 0-12).

Some, W., Hafidz, W., & Sauter, G. (2009). Renovation not relocation: the work of Paguyuban Warga Strenkali (PWS) in Indonesia. Environment and urbanization, 21(2), 463-475.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 264 time(s)
PDF: 245 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.