Open Journal Systems

HUBUNGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP DOSEN DENGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR DI PROGRAM STUDI KEPERAWATAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA

Hana Rosiana Ulfah, Supratman Supratman

Abstract

Learning necessity on college students encourages their motivation from the inside, whereas
the stimulus by lecturers encourages their motivation from the outside. In college students’
opinion, some nursing lecturers have not matched what they expect yet because they are
less interesting and monotonous on giving the learning material, indiscipline or not on-time.
Then most of the college students stated that those things also affected the learning
motivation, because the college students became lazy to listen as well as study. Whereas
the college students’ perception about good-figure of lecturer according to them was the
ones who were kind, smile easily, good-looking, not weighing against them, on-time, easy to
get a good mark from, not selfish, giving time outside the class to consult with, friendly and
close in the learning process either inside or outside the class, able to give the learning
material clearly and easy to understand as well as able to stimulate the college students’
learning motivation. The purpose of this research is to understand the relationship between
college students’ perception towards nursing lecturers and learning motivation in nursing
department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. This research was analytic research
with correlative approach. The population of this research was all active college students of
Nursing Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta year 2007-2010 whose total
was 921 college students with 90 college students as sample. The used sample extraction
technique in this research was proportionate stratified random sampling. Bivariate test using
spearman rank showed that there was no significant relationship between college students’
perception towards lecturers and college students’ learning motivation (p = 0.454).

Keywords

Learning necessity on college students encourages their motivation from the inside, whereas the stimulus by lecturers encourages their motivation from the outside. In college students’ opinion, some nursing lecturers have not matched what they expect yet

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmadi A, Widodo Supriyono. 2004. Psikologi Belajar. Hlm. 146-147. 215. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Arep I, Hendri Tanjung. 2003. Manajemen Motivasi. Hlm. 16-17. Grasindo: Jakarta.

Arikunto S. 2004. Psikologi Umum dan Perkembangan. Mizan Publika: Jakarta.

Azhari A. 2004. Psikologi Umum dan Perkembangan. Hlm. 65. 107. Mizan Publika: Jakarta

Djamarah S. 2002. Psikologi Belajar. Hlm. 115. 166-167. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta

Harsono. 2008. Model-model Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Perspektif Sosiopolitik. Hlm. 90. Pustaka

Pelajar: Yogyakarta.

Hassan F, Yuhara Sukra. 2007. Dalam Markum, M. Enoch (Ed). Pendidikan Tinggi dalam Perspektif

Sejarah dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Hlm. 132-133. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan

Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional: Jakarta.

Hartono J. 2006. Filosofi, Pendekatan, dan Penerapan Pembelajaran Metode Kasus untuk Dosen dan

Mahasiswa. Hlm. 17-18. 38. Andi: Yogyakarta

Hidayatullah F. 2009. Dalam Rohmadi, Muhammad (Ed). Guru Sejati : Membangun Insan Berkarakter

Kuat dan Cerdas. Hlm. 155.157. Yuma Pustaka: Surakarta

Hildebrand M, Kenneth Feldman. 2010. Ciri-ciri Dosen Ideal. Dalam Furchan, Arief (Ed.) Ciri-ciri

Dosen Profesional. Hlm. 1-2. Diakses tgl 24 November 2010.

http://www.pendidikanislam.net/index.php/untuk-guru-a-dosen/39-pendidikan/80-ciri-ciridosen-profesional?start=1

Ilyas. 2010. Peran Ideal Dosen Pembimbing Akademik dan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Dalam

Educare Jurnal Pendidikan dan Budaya. Hlm. 1-2. Diakses tgl 18 Oktober 2010.

educare.e-fkipunla.net/index2.php?option=com_content&doc

Nasution. 2008. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Hlm. 27. 119. 128. 129.

Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.

Pujadi A. 2007. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa : Studi Kasus Pada

Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bunda Mulia. Business and Management Journal Bunda Mulia.

Diakses tgl 30 Oktober 2010. budhi_sp.staff.gunadarma.ac.id/.../faktor-faktor

motivasi%2520belajar-jurnalarkopujadi.pdf. 1:44. 50.

Sastroasmoro, Sudigdo. 2008. Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis. Hlm. 49-50. 84. 96-99. 256.

Sagung Seto: Jakarta.

Sugiyono. 2005. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Hlm. 58. 65. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Sobur A. 2009. Psikologi Umum. Hlm. 296. Pustaka Setia: Bandung

Sarrazin P, Damien P. Tessier, Luc G. Pelletier, David O. Troilloud, Julien P. Channal. 2006. The

Effects Of Teachers Expectations about Students’ Motivations On Teachers AutonomySupportive

and Controlling Behaviors. Internasional Journal Of Sport and Exercise

Psychology. Diakses tgl 3 November 2010. halshs.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/38/.../Sarrazin_et_al_IJSEP_2006.pdf.

:20

Sardiman. 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Hlm. 73. 87. 143. Rajawali Pers: Jakarta

Salam B. 2004. Cara Belajar yang Sukses di Perguruan Tinggi. Hlm. 67-69. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Simamora R. 2009. Dalam Tiar, Estu (Ed). Buku Ajar Pendidikan Dalam Keperawatan. EGC: Jakarta.

Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Hlm. 102. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Tampubolon. 2001. Perguruan Tinggi Bermutu (Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Manajemen Pendidikan

Tinggi Menghadapi Tantangan Abad Ke-21). Hlm. 175. 178. Gramedia Pustaka Utama:

Jakarta.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia tentang Guru dan Dosen. 2005. Hlm. 2. Media Pusaka: Jakarta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.