PERGESERAN KESANTUNAN POSITIF SISWA KELAS IX MTs N 1 SURAKARTA BERLATAR BELAKANG BUDAYA JAWA

Khilyatin Ulin Noor(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research aims to describe the pattern of politeness and the shifts of positive politeness among students of class IX MTs N 1 Surakarta. In addition,
this research also aims to identify the factors that are influencing the emergence of positive politeness shift among those students. This research is classified as descriptive qualitative research. The data includes speech of class IX’s students that contains positive politeness. The data collected by taking notes from the students’ speech. Data sources are all students of class IX MTs N 1 Surakarta. Methods in analysis include the intralingual match methods by comparing the lingual elements with the extra-lingual elements. The results showed that there are six forms of positive politeness shifts which then lead to the 13 patterns of positive politeness strategy used by students who have Javanese culture backgrounds. Those patterns include attention to the pattern of preferences, desires, and the needs of what opponent said; exaggerate things to get attention, approval, and sympathy from the opponents; using a marker of group identity; seeking approval to repeat some or all of the speakers utterances; pseudo agreement, white lies, hedging opinion; small talk and presuppositions; jokes; expressed understanding or understanding what are the opponent said; making promises; show an attitude of optimism; involves the opponents in the activities; ask questions or give reasons; also reciprocal relationship. In addition, there are several factors that are influencing positive politeness shifts. They are social distance, contexts, excessive complimenting, deliberately asked for a reason, no harm intentions,

and rejections.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afifudin dan Beni Ahmad Saebani. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Brown, P. and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chaer, Abdul. 2010. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, Abdul. 2007. Kajian Bahasa Struktur Internal, Pemakaian dan Pemelajaran. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

CummingS,Louise. 2007. Pragmatik Sebuah Prespektif Multidisipliner. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rustono. 1999. Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Tarigan, H.G. 1968. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sumarlam, dkk. 2010. Teori dan Praktik Analisis Wacana. Solo: Putra Cakra Surakarta.

Syamsuddin dan Vismaia S. Darmaianti. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Yule, George. 2008. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Parera.1980. Teori Semantik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pranowo. 2008. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Indonesia Sebagai Pembentuk Kepribadian Bangsa” dalam Jurnal Gatra No.34 Th,xxiv/Januari 2008. PBSID FKIP Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.

Prayitno, Harun Joko. 2011. Kesantunan Sosiopragmatik: Studi Pemakaian Tindak Direktif di Kalangan Andik SD Berbudaya Jawa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Prayitno, Harun Joko. 2012. “Realisasi Tindak Tutur Direktif Dalam Pembelajaran Pragmatik:Berdaya, Berorientasi, dan Berstrategi Kesantunan Positif” dalam Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Bidang Ilmu Pragmatik dan Pengajarannya. Universitas Muhammadiyah

Surakarta.

Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. pp. 41–58.

Lakoff, R. T. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. Glasgow: Harper Collins.

Mahsun. 2005. Metode Penelitian Bahasa Tahapan strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Maryadi, dkk. 2011. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi FKIP. Surakarta: BP-FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Moleong, Lexy. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslich, Masnur. 2007. Kesantunan Berbahasa: Sebuah Kajian Sosiolinguistik.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 526 time(s)
PDF: 567 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.