. Sugiyono



The study describes the melodic structure of Indonesian language carried out
in two experiments: (1) the productive experiment which is to measure acoustic
features of declarative and interrogative statements and (2) the perceptive experiment,
to measure the sensibility of the Indonesian speakers in listening speech. The
two experiments were conducted by using the approach of experimental and psychoacoustic
phonetics. The result showed that Lindbom’s (1990) hypo-hyper theory
explaining the relation between speech production and perception in communication,
cannot fully be accepted. The first experiment was significant in at least three
acoustic features: fundamental frequency (F0) of the final note peak, of final mark,
and the position of final note peak (Pa) in contour; however, the three parameters
have not necessarily to occur altogether to expect the interrogativeness perception.
The two characteristics of F0: the height of F0 Pa and the final mark should
occur at the same time, whereas the features of final note peak (Pa) was not needed
to expect the interrogativeness perception. In short, the interrogative perception of
speech does not require more complete acoustic features when compared to their
productive parameters.

Full Text:



Alisjahbana, Sutan Takdir. 1983 (1949). Tatabahasa Baru Bahasa Indonesia. Cetakan ke- 44. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Alwi, Hasan; Sunjono Dardjowidjojo, Hans Lapoliwa, dan Anton N. Moeliono. 1998. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Brand, Thomas. 2000. Analysis and Optimization of Psychophysical Procedures in Audiology. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.

Ebing, Ewald. 1997. Form and Function of Pitch Movements in Indonesian. Leiden: Research School CNWS.

Green, D.M. 1990. “Stimulus Selection in Adaptive Psychophysical Procedures”. Dalam The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87:2662-2674.

Gussenhoven, C. et al. 1997. “The Perceptual Prominence of Fundamental Frequency Peaks”. Dalam The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102 (5): 3009—3022.

Halim, Amran. 1974 (1969). Intonation in Relation to Syntax in Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Nooteboom, Sieb. 1999. “The Prosody of Speech: Melody and Rhythm”. Dalam Hardcastle, William J. and John Laver. 1999. The Handbook of Phonetics Sciences. Oxford:

Basil Blackwell.

Odé, Cecilia and Vincent J. van Heuven (eds.). 1994. Experimental Studies of Indonesian Prosody (Semaian 9). Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.

Pané, Armjin. 1950. Mentjari Sendi Baru Tata Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Samsuri. 1971. Tjiri-tjiri Prosodi Kalimat Bahasa Indonesia. Malang: FKSS-IKIP Malang.

Small, Arnold M. 1973. “Psychoacoustics”. Dalam Minifie, Fred. D.; Thomas J. Hixon; and Frederick Williams. 1973. Normal Aspect of Speech, Hearing, and Language. New

Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sugiyono. 2002. “Pitch Marker of Interrogativity in Indonesian: Psychoachoustics Approach”. Makalah dalam International Symposium of Linguistics and Speech-Hearing Sciences 2002, Kuala Lumpur, 21–22 Oktober 2002.

Sugiyono. 2003. “Pemarkah Prosodik Kontras Deklaratif dan Interogatif Bahasa Melayu Kutai”. Disertasi Universitas Indonesia.

Suparno. 1993. Konstruksi Tema-Rema dalam Bahasa Indonesia Tidak Resmi Masyarakat Kotamadya Malang. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Van Heuven, V.J. dan J. Haan. 2000. “Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch”. Dalam Botinis A. (ed.) Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 119—143.

Zanten, Ellen van dan Vincent J. Van Heuven. 1994. “Effect of Word Length and Substrate

Language on the Temporal Organisation of Words in Indonesian”. Dalam Odé, Cecilia

dan Wim Stokhof (eds.). 1997:201—216.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 70 time(s)
PDF: 25 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.