PEMBELAJARAN SASTRA APRESIATIF DENGAN REKREASI-RESPONSI-REDESKRIPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KBK

Ali Imron Al-Ma'ruf(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The learning of literature in secondary, high, or vocational schools seems less appreciative. The main reason lies in the competency of literature teachers in ap- preciating literature beside the teaching for the target of curriculum and the Na- tional Grade Evaluation. The problem is show is the learning of literature viewed from Curriculum-Based-Competency (CBC) ? Which approach is appropriate for the appreciative learning of literature? A recreation-response-and-redescription model of learning literature using reception approach can be used as an alternative to realize a more appreciative learning of literature becauase it is in line with the CBC paradigm in stressing on the empowerment of students’ competency. To make such an empowering concrete, literature teachers may enhance their competency and commit on improving literary appreciation within their process of teaching and learning literature. In short, a change for a new paradigm for literature teach- ers is needed in the course of literature learning to have the spirit of CBC.

 

Key words:   Pembelajaran Sastra Apresiatif, rekreasi-responsi-redeskeripsi, KBK atau

CBC.

 

 

 

References

Abrams, M.H. 1981. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical

Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Aminuddin (Ed.), 1990. Sekitar Masalah Sastra Beberapa Prinsip dan Model

Pengembangannya. Malang: Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh.

Al-Ma‟ruf, Ali Imron. 2004. “Pemilihan Bahan Ajar Sastra” Makalah dalam

Seminar Nasional Sastra dan Pembelajarannya di Sekolah pada tanggal 19

April 2004 di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta.

Artika, I Wayan. 2002. “Diskusi Pasca Membaca Karya: Catatan Pembelajaran Sastra dari Sebuah SMU Negeri di Kota Singaraja, Bali Utara”. Makalah pada PILNAS HISKI XIII 8-10 September 2002 di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta.

Depdiknas Ditjen Dikdasmen. 2003. Kurikulum 2004 SMA Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Silabus dan Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum.

Djojosuroto, Kinayati. 2005. Puisi Pendekatan dan Pembelajaran, Gestal, Strukrural, Strukturalisme Genetik, Semiotik, Resepsi Sastra, Analisis Wacana. Bandung: Nuansa.

Frey, Nortthop. 1974. The Educated Imagination. Bloomington dan London: Indiana University Press.

Hawkes, Terence. 1978. Structuralism and Semiotic. London: Methuen and Co.

Limited.

Hasjim, Nafron dkk. 2001. Pedoman Penyusunan Bahan Penyuluhan Sastra.

Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Ismail, Taufik. 2000. “Tentang Cara Menjadi Bangsa Rabun Membaca dan Lumpuh Menulis Pula sehingga Jelas di Dunia Kita Pakar Terkemuka”, dalam Bahasa Indonesia dalam Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

. 2002. “Setelah Menguap dan Tertidur 45 Tahun” dalam Jabrohim dkk. (Ed). 2002. Dinamika Global-Lokal dalam Perkembangan Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pertemuan Ilmiah Nasional Himpunan Sarjana-Kesusastraan Indonesia XIII.

Knowles, Malcolm. 1986. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy versus Pedagogy. New York: Association Press.

Lazar, Gillian. 1993. Literature and Language Teaching, Answer Guide Teachers and Trainers. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Meeker, Joseph W. 1972. The Comedy of Survival: Studies in Literary Ecology. New

York: Charles Schribner‟s Sons.

Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. 1989. “Kritik Sastra Indonesia Modern Telaah dalam Bidang Teoretis dan Kritik Terapan”. Disertasi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.

Reeves, James. 1972. Teaching Poetry. London: Heinemann.

Satoto, Soediro. 1998. “Tokoh dan Penokohan dalam Caturlogi Drama „Orkes Madun‟ Karya Arifin C. Noer”. Disertasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia.

Sayuti, Suminto A. 2002. “Sastra dalam Perspektif Pembelajaran: Beberapa Catatan”, dalam Riris K. Toha-Sarumpaet (Ed). Sastra Masuk Sekolah. Magelang: Indonesiatera.

Selden, Raman. 1986. A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. The

Harvester Press: Sussex.

Suryaman, Maman dan Nurhadi, Felicia. 2005. Pedoman Review Buku Teks

Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan. Teeuw, A. 1983. Membaca dan Menilai Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.

. 2003. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 460 time(s)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia): 834 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share