Sumardi Sumardi



Assessment is an integral part of an English teachers’ instruction since it enables them to visualize the extent of successful instructions. However, teachers might not pay much attention to their role to help their students improve their learning. Even, many English language teachers seem to focus more on traditional formats of assessment such as multiple choice, true false, matching type, etc. and pay little attention to the washback effects of these kinds of assessment on students’ learning. This paper argues that a traditional assessment has at least two fundamental flaws. There is a little chance to identify the students’ factual skills as it only focuses on formal assessment. In addition, it only focuses on achievement of high scores under test conditions. This orientation can be misleading to the nature of language instruction itself. Therefore, this research article explores the washback effects of performance-based assessment as a current trend in English Language Teaching (ELT) in secondary-school students’ learning. To investigate this issue, in-depth interview, classroom observation, and document analysis were employed as the data collection methods. The merits of the research are to indicate how to arrange performance-based assessment and to identify its washback effects in the students’ learning. The results conclude that performance-based assessment encouraged and motivated students to learn more. Students’ perception in this type of assessment was positive and they strived to be more successful in their learning.


Keywords: performance-based assessment, washback effects, student learning.

Full Text:



Abedi, J. (2010). Performance assessments for English language teachers. Stanford, CA: Standford University, Standford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Aidogmus, Y; Aksu, R; & Kaya, M.F. (2014). The relationship between communication skills of geography teachers and students’ level of motivation towards geography lesson. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 4 (5)

Aksu Ataç, B. (2012). Foreign language teachers’ attitude toward authentic assessment in

language teaching. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8 (2)

Anderson, K. T. (2009). Applying positioning theory to the analysis of classroom interactions: Mediating micro-identities, macrokinds, and ideologies of knowing. Linguistics and Education, 6 (20).

Bass, K.M., Magone, M.E., & Glaser, R. (2002). Informing the design of performance assessments using a content-process analysis of two NAEP science tasks. (CSE Technical Report No. 564). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Brown, H.D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. San

Francisco: Longman Publisher

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching. New York: Routledge Callison, D. (1998). Authentic assessment. School Library Media Activities Monthly 14 (5) Irwin, B & Hepplestone, S. (2012). Examining increased flexibility in assessment formats.

Retrieved from 1/Irwin%20Flexible_assessment_


Bucholz, J.L. & Sheffler, J.L. (2009). Creating a Warm and Inclusive Classroom Environment: Planning for All Children to Feel Welcome. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, Vol. 2, No. 4 [2009], Art. 4

Buo, F. D., and Waibel, A. (1996). FeasPar - a feature structure parser learning to parse

spoken language. In Proceedings of the COLING ‘96, Kopenhagen.

Cheng, L., & Watanabe, Y. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research context and methods. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cheung, C.K. (2001). The use of popular culture as a stimulus to motivate secondary students’ English learning in Hong Kong. ELT Journal Vo. 55/1

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). No Child Left Behind and high school reform. Harvard

Educational Review, 76(4)

Ditjen Dikdasmen. 2015. Panduan penilaian untuk sekolah menengah atas. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Dorobat, D. (2007). The methodology of evaluation and testing. Athena: Ministerul Educatiei si Cercetarii

Gillies, R.M. & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of

implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (10)

Girmus, R.L. (2011). How to motivate your students. Articles was presented at New Mexico

State University -Grants Round -Up Conference, September 30 – October 1, 2011

Goldschmidt, P., Martinez, J. F., Niemi, D., & Baker, E. L. (2007). Relationships among measures as empirical evidence of validity: Incorporating multiple indicators of achievement and school context. Educational Assessment, 12 (3)

Hine, G.S.C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs.

Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 2013: Special Issue

Haney, W., & Madaus, G. (1989). Searching for alternatives to standardized tests: Whys, whats, and whithers. Phi Delta Kappan, 70 (87).

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Geelong,

Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

Linn, R.L., & Burton, E. (1994). Performance-based assessment: Implication of task specificity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13(1)

McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (2011). Performance-based assessment in the classroom. Retrived from http://jaymctighe/wordpress/wp.context/uploads/ 2011/004/performancebased- assessment-in-the-classroom.pdf

Mueller, J. (2014). Authentic assessment toolbox. Retrieved from http://jfmueller.faculty.

Neill, D.M., & Medina, N.J. (1989). Standardized testing: Harmful to educational health.

Phi Delta Kappan, 70(97).

O’Neil, J. (1992). Putting performance assessment to the test. Educational Leadership, 49(8)

Valdez Pierce, L., & O’Malley, J. M. (1992). Performance and portfolio assessment for language minority students. NCBE Program Information Guide Series, 14 (9)

Quadir, M. (2014). Relationship between learners’ motivation factors and speaking strategy factors to learn oral communication in English. The English Teacher 43 (3)

Safa, M.A, and Goodarzi, S. (2014) The Washback Effects of Task-based Assessment on the Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammar Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (14)

Sandelowski, M. (1991). Telling stories: Narrative approaches in qualitative research.

Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 23 (3)

Widodo, H.P. (2016). Engaging young learners of English in a genre-based digital storytelling

project. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta

Kappan, 70 (13).

Williams, K.C. & Williams, C.C. (2012). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Reseacrh in Higher Education Journal. Retrieved from http://www.aabri. com/manuscripts/11834.pdf

Article Level Metrics


  • There are currently no refbacks.