MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SINTAKSIS DI PERGURUAN TINGGI DI JATENG DAN DIY

Markhamah Markhamah, Abdul Ngalim, Muhammad Muinudinillah Basri, Tatik Mursiah, Ari Prasetyo, Thomas Prasetyo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v13i1.905

Abstract

A research on Syntax learning model in university is needed because such research is barely available for reference yet. Existing research on learning models are commonly carried out in high and middle schools, not university. This research aims to expose Syntax learning model in universities in Central Java and Yogyakarta.As object of research, two departments of Indonesian Language and Literature in Yogyakarta, one department of Indonesian language and Literature in Central Java, and one department of Indonesian Language and Literature Education in Central Java are chosen to be analyzed. The model includes: existence of lecture plan (RPP/RMP), teaching material, lecturer methods/strategy, learning media, and evaluation method. Data of research is collected through interview and document analysis, which is done quantitatively us- ing interactive and comparative models. This research reaches five conclusions. First, all departments in the research have both RPP (lecture plan) and RMP (lecture quality plan), even though with slight differences in names and details. Second, the departments have similarities and differences in term of teaching material. As a similarity, teaching material based on lecturer research is not found. Third, the departments have similarities and differences in term of teaching methods. Interestingly, some departments use unique learning method that synergizes with ideology of the particular university. Fourth, learning media between the departments is varied. Not every department is familiar with multimedia technology though some lecturers smartly use games as learning media to cover the lack of multimedia technology. Fifth, the departments use different evaluation method with different components. Some departments uses UKD (base competence test) while some are using UAS (end semester test).

Keywords

learning model; teaching material; learning method; learning evolution; syntax

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdullah, Imran Ho. 2008. “Transformasi Statistik Senarai Kekerapan Kata dalam Kajian Berdasarkan Korpus: Manifesto Pilihan Raya 2008”. Dalam Jurnal Bahasa. Jilid 9 Bil. 2, Disember 2009. http://jurnalbahasa.wordpress.com dikases pada 2 Juni 2012 Pukul 16.02 WIB.

Chaer, Abdul. 2011. Tata Bahasa Praktis Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 2006. Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Kesuma, Tri Mastoyo Jati. 2007. Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Carasvatibooks.

Kushartanti. 2009. “Strategi Kesantunan Bahasa pada Anak-anak Usia Prasekolah: Mengungkapkan Keinginan”. Dalam Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia. Tahun Ke-27, Nomor 2, Halaman 257-270, Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia.

Leung, Carrie. 2005. “A Comparison of The Use Major English Conjunctions by American and Hong Kong University Students (Using The HKUST Corpus, HKBU Corpus and The ICLE Corpus of American English)”. Tesis. Lunds: Lunds Universitet.

Mahsun. 2012. Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Markhamah dan Atiqa Sabardilla. 2010. Sintaksis 2: Keselarasan Fungsi, Kategori & Peran dalam Klausa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

_______. 2009. Analisis Kesalahan & Kesantunan Berbahasa. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Moleong. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nordquist, Richard. 2011. Transformation. Dalam http://grammar.about.com. Diakses pada 6 April 2013 Pukul 07.00 WIB.

Nurlina, Wiwin Erni Siti. 2009. “Frasa Nomina dalam Bahasa Jawa: Kajian Transformasional, Ancangan Penguasaan dan Pengikatan”. Dalam http://pusatbahasa.kemendiknas.go.id. Diakses pada 2 Juni 2012 Pukul 15.04 WIB.

Purwa, I Made. 2010. “Klausa Relatif Bahasa Sasak: Sebuah analisis Transformasi Generatif”. Dalam http://pusatbahasa.kemendiknas.go.id. Diakses pada 2 Juni 2012 Pukul 15.02 WIB.

Sabardila, Atiqa. dkk. 2003. Etika Berbahasa dalam Islam: Kajian Secara Linguistik. FKIP: UMS.

Sabariyanto, Dirgo. 2002. Klausa yang Berkonjungsi Subordinatif “Yen” Sebagai Pengisi Fungsi Sintaksis dalam Bahasa Jawa. Dalam Widyaparwa: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan. Volume 31, Nomor 2, Halaman 133-150, Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Setiyanto, Edi. 2004. Kalimat Majemuk Gabungan dalam Bahasa Jawa: Deskripsi Perilaku Sintaktik dan Penipean. Dalam Widyaparwa: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan. Volume 32, Nomor 1, Halaman 1-14, Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

_______. 2000. Kalimat Majemuk Setara Bahasa Jawa Berunsur Tiga Klausa: Kajian Kesetaraan Klausanya. Dalam Widyaparwa: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan. Nomor 54, Halaman 72-91, Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Suhardi. 2009. Klausa Komplemen dalam Kalimat Transformasi Sematan. Dalam Diksi: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Volume 16, Nomor 1, Halaman 87-95, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Tadjuddin, Moh.. 2002. Konjungsi Subordinatif Aspektualitas dan Temporalitas dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Dalam Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia. Tahun Ke-20, Nomor 1, Halaman 79-89, Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 888 time(s)
PDF: 1257 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.