PEMBELAJARAN PENJUMLAHAN BILANGAN PECAHAN DENGAN METODE CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) DI SD MUHAMMADIYAH PROGRAM KHUSUS, KOTA BARAT, SURAKARTA

Yulia Maftuhah Hidayati

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v13i1.919

Abstract

This study is aimed to describe the lesson plan, teaching learning process of sum of fractions based of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL), and the motivation of learners attend classes in learning. This study used a qualitative approach. The type of research is a case study. Validation of data is done through triangulation. Data were collected through interviews, observation, documentation, and testing. The technique of data analysis is descriptive, entrepretative. The results of this study indicate that (1) the development of lesson plan has been implemented routinely in every new school year, (2) the process of learning mathematics goes through three stages, namely preinstructional phase (preliminary / initial activity), instructional phase (core activities), and appraisal, (3) during the learning process, the students have a high motivation to participate in activities  because of the method used by teachers is fun and enjoyable

Keywords

CTL; fraction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andika. 2009.” Pembelajaran Kontekstual”. (www.teoripembelajaran.teknodik.net). Diakses 13

Mei 2009 jam 12.52.

Depdiknas. 2007. Naskah Akademik Pendidikan Keterampilan. Jakarta: Depdiknas. (www.puskur.net). Diakses 22 Mei 2009 jam 14.14.

Fitriyani, Wulan. 2010. “Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV SD Sekaran Kota Semarang Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah.” (http://digilib.unnes.ac.id). Diakses

Agustus 2010).

Gita, I Nyoman. 2007. “Implementasi Pendekatan Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa di Sekolah Dasar”. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan. Vol.1, No.1. (http://freewebs.com). Diakses 9 Februari 2010 jam10.44.

Hadi, Syaiful. 2008. “Pembelajaran Konsep Pecahan dengan Menggunakan Media Komik dengan Strategi Bermain Peran pada Siswa SD Kelas IV Semen Gresik”. (http:// www.puslitjaknov.org). Diakses 9 Februari 2010 jam 10.29.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Haryani, Ning. 2006. “Manajemen Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar”. Tesis. UMS: Tidak diterbitkan.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purwoto. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Mengajar. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Smith, Bettye P. 2006. “Contextual Teaching and Learning Practices in the Family and Consumer Sciences Curriculum”. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education. Vol. 24, No. 1. (http://www.natefacs.org). Diakses 1 Juni 2009 jam 7.33.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tim. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Tonkes, E. J., Loch, B. and Stace, A.W..2005. “An Innovative Learning Model for Computation in First”. Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology. v36 n7 p751 759. (http://www.eric.ed.gov). Diakses 3 Mei 2009 jam 08. 30.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 710 time(s)
PDF: 605 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.