Efektivitas Direct Intruction dengan Involving Students in Self-and Peer Evaluation terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

M. Zainudin(1), Dian Ratna Puspananda(2*)

(1) IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The research objective is to proof 1). models of direct instruction by involving students in self-evaluation and peer learning can provide better results than direct instruction, 2). students having a field dependent cognitive style have better learning outcomes than field independent, 3). In each of the learning model, whether the student has a field dependent cognitive style have better learning outcomes than independent field, 4). In each of the cognitive style, whether the model of direct instruction by involving students in self-evaluation and peer learning can provide better results than direct instruction. The population of this study was all students of mathematics education of IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro, fourth semester, in the academic year of 2014/2015. The sample of this study was all students of the fourth semester students in class A with the total number of 32 students and class B as many as 32 students. The sampling technique in this study was cluster random sampling. Results of the study were 1) models of direct instruction by involving students in self-evaluation and peer learning can provide better results than direct instruction, 2) students who have cognitive style independent field has learning outcomes that are better than field-dependent, 3) In each of the learning model, students who have cognitive style independent fields have significantly a better learning outcomes than field dependent, 4) In each of the cognitive style, whether the model of direct instruction by involving students in self-evaluation and peer always provide better learning outcomes significantly than direct instruction.

Keywords

direct instruction by involving students in self-evaluation and peer, direct instruction, field dependent, independent field, learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 Years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.

Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Nasution. (2011). Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Siswono, T. Y. (2008). Kumpulan Karya 2005-2007. Surabaya: UNESA Press.

Sutton, K. S. (2009). Educational Psychologi. Zurich, Switzerland: The Global Text Project.

Uno, H. B. (2006). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya: Analisis di Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Usodo, B. (2011). Profil Intuisi Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan MAsalah MAtematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependen dan Field Independen. Seminar Nasional MAtematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (hal. 95-172). Surakarta: UNS Press.

Wijaya, A. P. (2011). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT dan STAD Ditinjau dari Keingintahuan dan Gaya Kognitif Peserta Didik SMP di Kabupaten Blora. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Zainudin, M. (2012). implementasi Direct Instruction dengan Involving Students in Self-and Peer Evaluation untuk meningkatkan kreativitas dalam menyusun pendahuluan pada proposal penelitian kuantitatif. Acarya , 22-25.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 180 time(s)
PDF: 147 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.