Students’ Creativity in Geometry Course : How a Mystery Box Game Plays Important Role

Wanda Nugroho Yanuarto


The purpose of this study are encouraging students’ creativity by mystery box games and become more aware of their mathematical thinking. The situational problem as the starting point helps students to relate what they learn to problems in daily life, and construct and interpret geometry that are related to real situations, and this helps to correct their alternative conceptions in geometry courseto encourage students’ creativity in Geometry Course. There are three abilities to encouraging students’creativity, they are synthetic ability, analytic ability, and practical ability. The subjects of this research is the students of the 1st semester of 2014 academic year class A of mathematical education of Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia. The data of this research is through observation sheet, recording videos, portofolios, and questionnaires. Those data was analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. This study shows that to encouraging students’ creativity can analyzed by mystery box in Geometry Course.


Students’ creativity; geometry course; mystery box

Full Text:



Bobango, T. 1993. Geometry and analytic calculus. New York : Routledge

Baker, Scott and Gersten, Russell. 1998. Teal world use of scientific concepts: integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. California: Exceptional Students Press

Balka,C. 1974. Affective dimensions of learning. South California: Thomson Wadsworth

De Sonza, F.D. 1998. Development of mathematical communicaton in problem solving groups by language Minority Students. New York : Mc. Graw hill companies

Colburn, Alan. 2000. An Inquiry Geometry. Toronto: Science Scope

Davis, R. 1969. Students’s Ideas in Science. United Kingdom: Open Press.

Evan,G. I. 1964. A summary of a study of schooling: Some finding and Hypotheses. Toronto: Phi Delta Kappan

Fleith, Denise de Sonza. 2010. Lecturer and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers

Getzels,G.,& Jackson,F.S. 2008. Teaching science with toys and gaming. California: College Teaching Summer Press

Hashimoto. 1997. Opening assessment to our students social education. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.

Haylock. 2011. Science education. New York: Learning Express

Hennessdy, Beth A. 2008. Teaching for creative development: A social-psychological approach. Needman Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Jensen,I. 2009. Character countism. Washington: National Academy Press

Kohler, L. 1997. How to make hands-on science work for you. New York: Eric Clearinghouse on Information and Technology

Masduki, M.,, 2015. Pengembangan karakter dalam pembelajaran mateamtika: model di prodi pendidikan matematika FKIP UMS. Jurnal Varia Pendidikan, 26, 2, pp. 104-115. Available:

Ross, Michael Elsohn. 2012. Science their way. Young Students, pp 63.

Singh,Y.E. 2010. School science in gaming. London and New York: The Penguin Group

Sloan, Megan. 1996. I love geometry. California: College Express Group

Sheeffield, 2009. First- and second-grade studetns communication in mathematics.teaching students mathematics. Toronto: Thomson Wadsworth

Stenberg & Lubart, 2009. Using think time and wait time skillfully in the classroom. Texas: ERIC Digest

Tayman, Juliann M. and Thompson, Kathleen Lewis. 1996. Taking the chaos out of cooperative learning: the 3 most important components. New Jersey: The Clearing House Company in Press

Widjaja, Y.B. 2002. How realistic approach and gaming based lesson work in Indonesian secondary school classroom [On-line]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Available:

Wirawati, I. & Kurniawan, F. 2015. How teacher become “good” at what they do a narrative approach.. Jurnal Varia Pendidikan, 27, 1, pp. 62-69. Available:

Article Level Metrics


  • There are currently no refbacks.