Ekperimentasi Metode Conceptual Understanding Procedures dan Mind Mapping Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

Anis Mahmudah(1*), Sri Sutarni(2), Sri Rejeki(3)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims at evaluating: (1) the difference of students’ mathematics learning achievement viewed from two different learning methods, (2) the difference of students’ mathematics learning achievement viewed from different learning styles, (3) the effect of interaction between teaching methods and learning styles on students’ mathematics learning achievement. This study is a quantitative research with quasiexperimental research design. The population of this study is 210 students of 10thgrade of SMA MTA Surakarta. Two classes were chosen for the sample of this study by cluster random sampling. The first class was treated using Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) method and the second class was treated using Mind Mapping method. The data collection was conducted using test, questionnaire, and documentation. Morever, the data was analized using different number of cell analysis of variance with 5% significance level. The conclusion are: (1) there is difference on student’s mathematics learning achievement viewed from two different learning methods, Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) a give better achievement than Mind Mapping, (2) there is no difference on students’ learning achievement viewed from different learning styles, (3) there is no effect of interaction between teaching methods and learning styles on students’ mathematics learning achievement.

Keywords

conceptual understanding procedures (CUPS); learning styles; learning achievement; mind mapping

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggreni, Rita dkk. 2012. Model Pembelajaran Conceptual Understanding Procedures Ber- pengaruh Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus VII Kompiang Sujana Denpasar Barat. Skripsi. Singaraja: FIP Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (tidak diterbitkan)

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

_____________. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Budiyono. 2009. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Gunawan, Adi. 2007. Genius Learning Strategi Petunjuk Praktis untuk Menerapkan Accelarated Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hamid, Sholeh. 2011. Metode Edutainment. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.

Isjoni. 2011. Cooperative Learning. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Jihad, Asep dan Abdul Haris. 2010. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multipressindo.

Monash University. 2003. “Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs). how do i use aCUPs?”(online). http://monash.edu/education/rsearch/projects/conc eptualunderstanding rocedures/diakses tanggal 6 November 2014)

OECD.“Indonesia Student performance (PISA 2012)”. (online) http://gpseducation .oecd.org/ CountryProfile?primaryCountry=IDN&treshold=10&topic=PI, diakses tanggal 8 November 2014)

Sudjana, Nana. 2008. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2010. Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutama. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Kartasura: Fairus Media.

Vijayakumari dan Kavithamole. 2014. “Mind Mapping: A tool for Mathematical Creativity”. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Science 2(1): 252-269.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 416 time(s)
PDF: 308 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.