PERBANDINGAN KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA SISWA SMA BERPOLA ASUH OTORITER DAN DEMOKRATIS ANTARA YANG DIAJAR DENGAN MODEL SQ3R DAN PQRST

Khabib Sholeh(1*)

(1) Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Coventional technique of reading is commonly used by Senior Hugh School Students that this may due to their low interest and achievement in reading. However, there are more effective reading-techniques such as SQ3R and PQRST and also another factor influencing students'achievement, family-learning way model. The study presents a comparison between reading ability for Seniro High School students using authoritative and democratic way, being taught by using SQ3R and PQRST models. It is an experimental study using students of SMA N 5 Purworejo by factorial design. For the experiment, we selected two classes consisting of the class X-1 as the first experiment group while the class X-2 as the second one. Based on family-learning way model, each group of experiment is devided into two sub-groups, the one getting authoritative while the other getting democratic treatment. The result shows that (1) reading ability of Senior High School students using authoritative family-learning who are taught using SQ3R model, is better than those being taught by using PQRST; (2) reading ability of Senior High School students using democratic way who are taught by using PQRST model, is better than those being taught by using SQ3R; and (3) there is interaction between reading technique using family-learning way model and the students' achievement. In short, technique of reading using family-learning way model has influenced students' achievement of reading.

Key words: achievement, family-learning model, authoritative, SQ3R, and PQRST

Full Text:

PDF

References

Gie, The Liang. 1984. "Metode-Metode Modern Membaca Buku Pelajaran". Kemajuan Studi. Nomor IV, April 1984. Hlm. 24-37.

Goodman, Knneth. 1988. "The Reading Process" dalam Carral et al. (ed.). Interactive Approach to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hlm. 42-56.

Harras, Khalid A. dan Lilis Siti Sulistyaningsih. 2001. Membaca I. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan UT.

Melendes, E. jane dan Pritchard R.H. 1985. "Applying Schema Theory to Foreign Language Reading" dalam Foreign Language Annals, Volume 18, Nomor 5. Hlm. 399-403.

Munandar, S.C. Utami. 1990. Mengembangkan Bakat dan Kreativitas Anak Sekolah. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Paul, Walter. 1974. How to Study in College. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Dikutip oleh The Liang Gie. Kemajuan Studi, Nomor 4, April 1984. Hlm. 22-37.

Rosidi, ajip. 1973. Pembinaan Minat Baca, Apresiasi, dan Penelitian Sastra. Jakarta: Panitia Tahun Buku Internasional.

Robinson, Francis P. 1946. Effective Study. New York: Harper dan Brothers.

Resnick, William C. dan David H. Heller. 1969. On You Own in College. Columbus: Charlea E. Merrill, edisi kedua.

Soedarso. 2002. Speed Reading Sistem Membaca Cepat dan Efektif. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Soeparno. et al. 1988. "Study Experimental Metode Membaca PQRST dan Metode Membaca STUDY terhadap Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Indoenesia FPBS IKIP Yogyakarta". Laporan Penelitian IKIP Yogyakarta.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2002. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1984. Membaca Ekspresif. Bandung: Angkasa.

Zuchdi, Darmiyati. 1988. " Minat Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FPBS IKIP Yogyakarta untuk Membaca Literatur". Hasil Penelitian IKIP Yogyakarta.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 391 time(s)
PDF: 323 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.