KONSEP ANIMASI DALAM NOMINA BAHASA JAWA: SEBUAH KAJIAN TIPOLOGI ANIMASI AWAL

Khristianto Khristianto(1*), Ambar Pujiyatno(2), Condro Nur Alim(3)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(3) Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study discussed the animacy concept in Javanese. This is to show how the animacy concept is reflected on pronouns and parts of the body, and behavioral verbs (agentive) between human, animal, and thing. This is a descriptive qualitative study employing the data from Javanese compared to English and Indonesia to clarify the animacy concept. The theoretical perspective used to analyze is the animacy concept from Comrie (1989). The analysis reveals that Javanese has no pronoun for non-human (animal and things), as the case in Indonesian. Meanwhile, English has it and there are pronouns for third person non-human, singular and plural. However it does not distinguish between animals and things. Thus, Javanese and Indonesia apply animacy hierarchy in their pronoun system. Another hierarchy is seen in the words to refer to body parts. It is only Javanese showing distinct characteristics; it uses high variants to refer to the human body. The same case is also found in the verbs (action) done by the human agent. Meanwhile two other languages do not apply this animacy hierarchy. Thus, the animacy hierarchy has a strongest influence on Javanese grammatical system, compared to the other two.

References

Bayanati, Shiva & Toivonen, Ida. (2019). Humans, Animals, Things and Animacy. Open Linguistics: De Gruyter.

Bjerva, Johannes. (2014). Multi-class Animacy Classification with Semantic Features. Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop at the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 65–75, April 26-30 2014. Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bloume, J. & Boume, G. (2013). Automatic Animacy Classification for Dutch. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 3, 82-102.

Comrie, Bernard. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

De Swart, Peter & Van Bergen, Geertje. (2019). How Animacy and Verbal Information Influence V2 Sentence Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements. Open Linguistics 2019;5: hal 630-649. De Gruyter Moutoun.

Handani, S. W., Suyanto, M., & Sofyan, A. F. (2016). Penerapan Konsep Gamifikasi pada E-Learning untuk Pembelajaran Animasi 3 Dimensi. Telematika, 9(1), 42-53.

Igartua, Iván & Santazilia, Ekaitz. (2018). How Animacy and Natural Gender Constrain Morphological Complexity: Evidence from Diachrony. Open Linguistics 2018; 4: 438–452. De Gruyter Moutoun.

Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski. (2011). Introduction to Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles. In: Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (Eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles, 1-26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mahsun. (2019). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moelong, Lexy. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wahyuni, S. (2018). Pengaruh Animasi Film terhadap Pencapaian Siswa dalam Menulis Teks Deskriptif. JUMANT, 9(1), 135-142.

Wiltschko, Martina & Ritter, Elizabeth. (2015). The Linguistic Review, 32(4): pp. 869–908. De Gruyter Mouton.

Zaim, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. Padang: Sukabina Press.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 324 time(s)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia): 323 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.