PERAN PENGAJAR DALAM WACANA KELAS PEMBELAJARAN BIPA DARING

Winasti Rahma Diani(1*), Asri Wijayanti(2), Meilina Meilina(3)

(1) Universitas Tidar
(2) Universitas Tidar
(3) Universitas Tidar
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has encouraged teachers and students to adapt to online learning synchronously, asynchronously, or via hybrid. The synchronous online learning is widely chosen for foreign language learning, such as BIPA (Indonesian Language for Foreign Learner). BIPA teachers and students can interact as a classical class through synchronous online learning. Therefore, this study aims at finding the role of the teacher in the classroom discourse of online BIPA learning. The observations were conducted in the classroom of online BIPA learning using Google Meet application as a learning media. From the observations, it was found that the roles of teachers and students were not balanced since the teacher had a very dominant role in the classroom discourse. The dominance of the teacher's role can be seen from the teacher's actions in controlling interaction, modifying speech, eliciting, and repair. As a result, the teacher's role affects the interaction patterns, students' opportunities to use the target language, students' understanding, and students' ability to solve problems. 

References

Adjei, A. A., & Ewusi-Mensah, L. (2019). Code-Switching And Code-Mixing among University Lecturers In Formal Interactions With Students. Journal of Language and Linguistics, (6).

Al-Ghamdi, H., & Al-Bargi, A. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Speech Modification on the Quality of Interaction and Learning: An Analysis of Spoken Discourse in Saudi EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Linguistics, 9(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i3.11382

Al-Smadi, O. A. (2017). A Theoretical Review of Classroom Discourse. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v6-i3/3169

Bajrami, L., & Ismaili, M. (2016). The Role of Video Materials in EFL Classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 502–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.068

bin Dahmash, N. (2021). Synchronous and asynchronous English writing classes in the EFL context: Students’ practices and benefits. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12.

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers and Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

Chau, K. Y., Law, K. M. Y., & Tang, Y. M. (2021). Impact of self-directed learning and educational technology readiness on synchronous E-learning. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 33(6), 1–20.

Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314.

Dixon, R. A., Hall, C., & Shawon, F. (2019). Using Virtual Reality and Web Conferencing Technologies: Exploring Alternatives for Microteaching in a Rural Region. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 4.

Fachriyah, E. (2017). The functions of code switching in an English language classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 4(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v4i2.6327

Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69.

Ghandi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2014). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ spelling errors. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p53

Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2020). Folk pedagogies for teacher transitions: Approaches to synchronous online learning in the wake of COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 201–209.

Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512.

Kamilah, F. A., & Cahyani, L. I. (2020). Elicitation Techniques Used by A Pre-Service Teacher in EFL Classroom. Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 8(2).

Kassaie, L., Shairi, H. R., & Gashmardi, M. R. (2021). Integrating MALL into the Classroom: The Cultural and‎ Pedagogical Impact of Authentic Podcasts on FFL Learners’‎ Listening and Speaking Skills. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 9(1), 69–85.

Macaro, E. (2020). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678

Mahfoozifard, S., & Mehdiabadi, F. (2016). The Effect of Direct VS. Indirect Feedback on the Speaking Accuracy of Iranian Learners at Elementary Level of Proficiency. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 5(2), 99–105. http://www.isicenter.org

Markee, N. (2015). The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction. www.blackwellreference.com

Marshall, H. W., & Kostka, I. (2020). Fostering Teaching Presence through the Synchronous Online Flipped Learning Approach. Tesl-Ej, 24(2), n2.

Nurhamidah, N., Fauziati, E., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Code-Switching in EFL Classroom: Is It Good or Bad? Journal of English Education, 3(2), 78–88.

Nurpahmi, S. (2017). Teacher Talk in Classroom Interaction. Eternal (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 3(1), 34-43.

Paramartha, A., Ramawati, N. M. S., & Suputra, P. E. D. (2018). Types, purpose, and strategies of teacher’s questions in Indonesian EFL classroom of junior high school in Bali. International Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 8–18.

Peterson, A. T., Beymer, P. N., & Putnam, R. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1517

Puspawati, I. (2018). Teachers’ Use of Code Switching in EFL Classroom and its Functions. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 42–51.

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417.

Rinekso, A. B., & Muslim, A. B. (2020). Synchronous online discussion: teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.646

Rymes, B. (2008). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool for Critical Reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Silalahi, T. F., & Hutauruk, A. F. (2020). The application of cooperative learning model during online learning in the pandemic period. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(3).

Sumandiyar, A., Husain, M. N., Sumule, M., Nanda, I., & Fachruddin, S. (2021). The effectiveness of hybrid learning as instructional media amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 5(3), 651–664.

Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., Azmon, S., & Dreyfus, T. (2020). Following the traces of teachers’ talk-moves in their students’ verbal and written responses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 509–528.

Usman, B., Ayouni, N., Samad, I. A., & Fitriani, S. S. (2018). Teachers’ Elicitation: Inviting Students to Speak. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 3(1), 51–65.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse Language in Action. Oxon: Routledge.

Wetzl, A., & Lieske, P. (2020). The Benefits and Limitations of Online Peer Feedback: Instructors’ Perception of a Regional Campus Online Writing Lab. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 332 time(s)
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia): 255 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.