Training Scenario Development on Environmental Education Using The STSE Model to Improve Positive Attitudes of Prospective Early Childhood Education Teachers towards The Environment

MA Muazar Habibi(1*)

(1) Early Childhood Education Teacher Program, Department of Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Mataram University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop training scenarios on environmental education using Science, Technology, Society, Environment (STSE) model integrated into scientific thematic lessons, particularly for prospective early childhood teachers. In addition, product efficiency on the positive attitudes of the trainers towards the environment was examined. The above-mentioned objectives are possibly achieved with the following activities: 1) initializing the Borg & Gall model (1999) and 2) assessing the resulting product value using t-test, termed pre-test and post-test. Therefore, the applied simulations were declared suitable for use after series of  developmental events.

The results involved three expert assessments in the field of early childhood, environmental education, and educational technology, although further analysis is required. Subsequent investigation conducted on the subject user group, indicating a positive value of 83.3%, in support of the product.

Therefore, the efficiency test results showed the training on environmental education using the STSE model and integrated with scientific thematic lessons, were known to enhance 32.44% of all aspects of the prospective teacher's positive attitudes on the environment.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ben-Zvi, O. & Orion, N., Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education, Journal of Research Science Teaching, 42(5), 518-560, 2005.

Borg, W. D. & Gall, MD. 1999. Educational Research: An Introduction. New York : Longman

Goleman, D. 2009. Ecological Intelligence-How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy can Change Everything, Broadway Books, The Crown Publishing Groups

Keraf, A.S. 2002. Etika Lingkungan. Jakarta : Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Kamen, M. Editorial: Do we need more science education research?, Electronic Journal of Science Education, 15, 2, 2011

Kirkpatrick, D.J. 1994. Evaluating Training Program: The Four Level. San Francisco: Berret Koehler Publishing, Inc.

KLH. 2005. Data lingkungan hidup, (http://www.menlh.go.id/), diakses pada tanggal 17 Februari 2012

KLH. 2009. Data lingkungan hidup, (http://www.menlh.go.id/) diakses pada tanggal 17 Februari 2012

KLH. 2010. Agenda 21 Indonesia, 2010. Strategi Nasional untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: Kantor Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup

Laws, D., Scholz, R., Shiroyama, H., Susskind, L., Suzuki, T. & Weber O., Expert Views on Sustainability and Technology Implementation, International Journal of Sustainable Development in World Ecology, 11(3), 247-261, 2004

Levy Nahum, T., Azaiza, I., Kortam, N., Ben-Chaim, D., Herscovitz, O. & Zoller, U., “Does STES-Oriented Science Education Promote 10th-Grade Students’ Decision Capability?”, International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1315-1336, 2010.

Tal, T., Dori, Y. J., Keiny, S., & Zoller, U., Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development, e STEMS Project approach, International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 247-262, 2001

Zoller, U., Donn, S., Wild, R. and Beckett, P., “Students’ Versus eir Teachers’ Beliefs and Positions on Science/Teaching/Society (S/T/S)- Oriented Issues”, International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 25-36, 1991a

Zolle, Uri. Science, Technology, Environment, Society (STES) Literacy for Sustainability: What Should it Take in Chem/Science Education?/ Journal CHEMISTRY EDUCATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 207-213, © Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, ISSN 0187-893-X

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 204 time(s)
PDF: 148 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.