Analisis Bahaya dan Resiko Bencana Gunungapi Papandayan (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Cisurupan, Kabupaten Garut)

Saut Aritua Hasiholan Sagala(1*), Hadian Idhar Yasaditama(2)

(1) Institut Teknologi Bandung
(2) Institut Teknologi Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Risk assessment is an important step to be carried out for disaster management. It provides information for decision makers and communities in pre-disaster, during disaster and post disaster event. Nevertheless, risk assessment in Indonesia, especially on active volcanoes is still limited. This paper presents the risk assessment of Mt. Papandayan (2.665 m), the most active volcano in West Java. The unit of analysis in this study follows the administrative boundaries of village so that the identification can be applied at village level using GIS. Hazard analysis refers to the official hazard map produced by PVMBG while the vulnerability analysis is carried out in 3 sub-analysis, physical vulnerability (7 indicators), social vulnerability (7 indicators), and economic vulnerability. The hazard and vulnerability were overlayed in order to produce the risk which is subsequently made into risk map. The findings indicate that the villages located near and on the direction of the crater have relatively higher risk compared to other villages. The risk map can be incorporated as one of references for spatial planning that integrates disaster mitigation.

Keywords

GIS; hazard; Papandayan; risk assessment; vulnerability

Full Text:

PDF

References

BPS Jawa Barat. 2009. Luas Panen, Hasil Per Hektar dan Produksi Padi Jawa Barat. Diakses dari http://jabar.bps.go.id/index.php/pertanian/21-luas-panen-hasil-per-hektar-danproduksi-padi-jawa-barat pada 28 Juli 2011.

Coppola, D. 2007. Introduction to International Disaster Management. Oxford. Elsevier.

Cutter, Susan L., Mitchell, Jerry T., Scott, Michael S. 2000. Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of George Town County, South Carolina. Annals of the

Association of American Geographers, 90(4), p. 713-737. Blackwell Publishers.

Cutter, Susan L., Boruff, Bryan J., Shirley, W. Lynn. 2003. Social Vulnerability to Environmental

Hazards. Southwestern Social Science Association.

Dinas Pariwisata Jawa Barat. 2010. Wisata Pegunungan-Gunung Papandayan. Diakses dari http:/

/disparbud.jabarprov.go.id/wisata/dest-det.php?id=34〈=id pada 18 Juni 2011

ESDM. 2007. Peningkatan Status G. Papandayan menjadi Waspada. Diakses dari http://psdg.bgl.esdm.go.id /index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=513:peningkatan-statusgpapandayan-menjadi-waspada&catid=8:geolog pada 18 Juni 2011

ESDM. 2008. Status Aktivitas Gunung Papandayan Ditingkatkan. Diakses dari http://www. esdm. go. id/berita/geol ogi/42-geologi/1658-status-aktivitas-gunungpapandayan-ditingkatkan.html pada 18 Juni 2011

Fauzi, Y., Susilo, B. dan Mayasari, Z. 2009, Analisis Kesesuaian Lahan Wilayah Pesisir Kota Bengkulu Melalui Perancangan Model Spasial dan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG), Forum Geografi, Vol. 23, No. 2, Desember 2009: 101-111

Fothergill, A. 1996. Gender, Risk, and Disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies Ana Disasters, March 1996, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 33-56. Department of Sociology, The Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado, Colorado.

Hadisantono, R. D., Sumpena, A. D., and Santoso, M. S. 1998. Peta Kawasan Rawan Bencana Gunung Api Papandayan Provinsi Jawa Barat. Direktorat Vulkanologi. Kecamatan Cisurupan dalam Angka 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Garut

Kelompok Keilmuan Geodesi ITB. Pemantauan Deformasi Gunungapi Papandayan dengan GPS. Diakses dari http://geodesy.gd.itb.ac.id/?page_id=288 pada 15 November 2011

Kompas. 2011. Gunung Papandayan Siaga. Diakses dari http://regional.kompas.com/read/2011/08/13/08025542/Gunung.Papandayan.Siaga pada 13 Agustus 2011

Lavigne, Franck. 1999. Lahar Hazard Micro-Zonation and Risk Assessment in Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. Geo Journal 49: 173–183. Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Lirer, L., Vitelli, L. 1998. Volcanic Risk Assessment and Mapping in the Vesuvian Area Using GIS. Natural Hazards 17:1-15

Mutalazimah, Handaga, B., Sigit, A. Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Geografis pada Pemantauan Status Gizi Balita di Dinas Kesehatan Sukoharjo, Forum Geografi, Vol. 23, No. 2, Desember 2009, 153-166

Pareschi, M. T., Cavarra, L., Favalli, M., Giannini, F., Meriggi, A. 2000. GIS and Volcanic Risk Management. Natural Hazards 21: 361-379. Netherlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Pemerintah Kabupaten Garut. 2011. Profil Ekonomi. Diakses dari http://www.garutkab.go.id/pub/static_menu/detail/ekonomi_profile_domestik pada 28 Juli 2011

Permen ESDM (Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral) Nomor 15 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Mitigasi Bencana Gunung Api, Gerakan Tanah, Gempa Bumi, dan Tsunami

PKPU. 2002. Laporan Bencana Alam Gunung Papandayan, Garut Jawa Barat. Diakses dari http://www.pkpu.or.id/news/laporan-bencana-alam-gunung-papandayan-garut-jawabarat pada 18 Juni 2011.

Prahasta, E. 2002. Konsep-Konsep Dasar Sistem Informasi Geografis. Informatika. Bandung.

PVMBG. 1998. Gunung Papandayan. Diakses dari www.garutkab.go.id/galleries/pdf_link/sekilas/gunung_papandayan.pdf pada 1 April 2011.

Quesada, Jose Fernando Aceves, Salgado, Jesus Diaz, and Blanco, Jorge Lopez. 2007.

Vulnerability Assessment in A Volcanic Risk Evaluation in Central Mexico through A Multicriteria-GIS Approach. Nat Hazards (2007) 40:339–356. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Sagala, S. and Bisri, M. 2011 Perencanaan Tata Ruang Berbasis Kebencanaan di Indonesia, dalam Anwar, H. dan Haryono, H. (2011) Perspektif Kebencanaan dan Lingkungan di Indonesia: Studi Kasus dan Pengurangan Dampak Risikonya. Penerbit Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI).

Thouret, J. C., and Lavigne, Franck. 2000. Hazards and Risks at Gunung Merapi, Central Java: A Case Study.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2005. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities do Disasters. World Conference on Disaster Reduction 18-22 January 2005. Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.

United Nations. 2002. Living With Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. United Nations/Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Geneva: UN/ISDR

Utami, P. 2008. Measuring Social Vulnerability in Volcanic Hazards: The Case Study of Merapi Volcano, Indonesia. University of Bristol Dissertation in degree of Master of Science in Science of Natural Hazards in the Faculty of Science

Westen, C. J. v., Montoya, Lorena, Boerboom, Luc. 2002. Multihazard Risk Assessment Using GIS in Urban Areas: A Case Study for the City of Turrialba, Costa Rica. The Regional Workshop on Best Practices in Disaster Mitigation. International Institute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands and Elena Badilla Coto, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica

Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disaster. London. Routledge.

Wittiri, S. R. 2004. Gunung Api Indonesia. Direktorat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi Direktorat Jenderal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral Departemen Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral.

DOI: 10.23917/forgeo.v26i1.5046

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 2332 time(s)
PDF: 1297 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share