PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN DAN PENGAWASAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PT KERETA API INDONESIA (Persero) DI KANTOR DAOP IV SEMARANG
Sami'an Sami'an(1*), Estu Aprilian NW(2)(1) Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Mahasiswa Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
workers’ job of PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) at office DAOP IV Semarang. 2) The
significant influence between leadership and supervision of workers’ job of PT Kereta Api
Indonesia (Persero) at office DAOP IV Semarang. 3) Which variables between leadership and
supervision at once that giving dominant influence towards workers’ job at PT Kereta Api
Indonesia (Persero) at office DAOP IV Semarang. The population of this Descriptive research
is all of workers at PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) at office DAOP IV Semarang. It took
114 workers as a samples by using random sampling technique. Data collection used questionaere
and will analyzed by using doubled regresi linie ,test F, test t, test R2, and relative and efektive
contribution. Research conclusion, those are; 1)” There is significant leadership’ influence
towards workers’ job can be received. It is based on doubled regresi linier analysis (test/uji t) is
known that thitung > ttabel, that is: 2,862> 2,000 and significance value < 0,05, that is:
0,001 wth efective contribution 25,34%. 2) “ There is significant influence towards workers’
job can be received. It is based on doubled regresi linier analysis (test/uji t) is known that
thitung > ttabel, that is 3,653 > 2,000 and significance value < 0,05, that is 0,000 with
efective contribution 27,96%. 3) “ There is significant leadership’ influence and supervision
at once towards workers’ job can be received. It is based on variation doubled regresi linier
analysis (test/uji F) is known that Fhitung > Ftabel,that is 11,914 > 3,150 and significance <
0,05, that is 0,000. 4) Test result of determination coefisient (R2) is 0,533 showed that the
significance of leadership influence and job supervision at once towards workers’ job is 53,3%,
while 46,7% the rest is influenced by another variable that has not investigated.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atmo, Soeprapto, Krisdarto. 2001. Menuju SDM Berdaya. Jakarta: Alex Media Kompatindo.
Budiyono. 2006. Statistik Dasar Untik Penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariaet Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Gibson, J. James, Invencevich, M. John dan Donnely, H. James. 2005. Organisasi Perilaku, Struktur, Proses, Alih Bahasa Savi Tri Soekisno, Agus Dharma Edisi Ke Delapan. Jakarta:Erlangga.
Handoko, T. Hani. 2004. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 2001. Manajemen SDM Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Irawan, Prasetya, dkk. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Lembaga Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Sekolah Ilmu Administrasi.
Manullang dan Marihot. 20002. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: Badan Percetakan UGM.
Miner, John B. 1998. Organizational Beavior: Performance and Productivity, First Edition, Random House, Inc. York.
Robbin dan Coulter. 2006. Manajemen. Jakarta: Ikrar Mandiri Abadi.
Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2004. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Edisi Revisi IV Cetakan II). Jakarta: Rineke Cipta.
Suharsimi, Arikunto. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Sondang, P. Siagan. 2002. Kiat Meningkatkan Produktivitas Kerja (Cetakan Pertama). Jakarta: Rineke Cipta.
Tjiptono, Fandy. 2002. Manajemen SDM. Jakarta: IPWL.
Veithzal dan Riva’i. 2005. Perfrmance Appracial. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 610 time(s)PDF: 1923 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
